VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Ogam Jamoh v. The State of Ap

Allowed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
23 August 2023
Bench
Nani Tagiaauthor
Case no.
AB 50/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 23.08.2023

Heard Mr. T. Tayeng, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the accused applicant. Also heard Ms. Topi Jini, learned Addl. P.P., appearing on behalf of the respondent State of Arunachal Pradesh. Page No.# 2/3 Apprehending his arrest in connection with Pasighat P.S. Case No. 66/2023, registered under Sections 295/447/427/34 of the Indian Penal Code; this anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been preferred by the accused applicant Sri Ogam Jamoh seeking grant of pre-arrest bail.

Case Diary called for, vide order dated 16.08.2023, was produced by the learned Addl. P.P., Arunachal Pradesh, on 21.08.2023, on which date; it was also apprised to this Court that Notice under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was issued by the I.O. of the case to the accused applicant, named-above, to appear before the I.O. on 21.08.2023, at 1030 hrs., for recording of his statement. In view thereof; the learned Addl. P.P., Arunachal Pradesh, was directed to produce the updated Case Diary including the statement of the accused applicant recorded on

21.08.2023.

Pursuant thereto, today, the learned Addl. P.P., Arunachal Pradesh, has produced before the Court, the updated Case Diary along with the recorded statement of the accused applicant who had appeared before the I.O. of the case on 21.08.2023, in terms of the Notice issued to him under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. I have perused the Case Diary as well as the recorded statement of the accused applicant under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, pursuant to his appearance before the I.O. of the case on 21.08.2023, in terms of the Notice under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Page No.# 3/3 In view of the above and having perused the Case Diary produced; I am of the considered view that the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the accused applicant, deserves to be allowed.

Accordingly, in the event, the accused applicant, herein, is arrested by the police in connection with Pasighat Police Station Case No. 66/2023; he shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-with a surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, subject to the conditions that:-

(i). he shall appear before the I.O. of the case in connection with Pasighat P.S. Case No. 66/2023, as and when, he is required to do so; and

(ii). he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts either to the Police Officer or to the Court or tamper with the evidence.

The bail application accordingly stands allowed and disposed of in terms above.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040010912023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/50/2023 Ogam Jamoh Son of Shri Matgom Jamoh, Resident of Tigra Village, PO/PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS THE STATE OF AP Represented by the Public Prosecutor. Advocate for the Petitioner : T Tayeng A Dalbang Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.