- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 5 March 2024
- Bench
- N. Unni Krishnan Nair
- Case no.
- WP(C) 339/2022
Judgment
ORDER Date : 06.03.2024 Mr. M. Kato, learned DSGI submits that during the pendency of the present proceedings, the parties have resolved the issue and accordingly, the issue that has arisen in present proceedings no longer remains to be required to be adjudicated upon.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order passed, if any, shall stand vacated.
However, in the event, any fresh cause of action on the said issue arises, the petitioners are at liberty to approach this Court strictly in accordance with law. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040011552022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/339/2022 The Union of India and Anr. Represented through the Secretary of the Ministry of Defence, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 2: The Defence Estate Officer Age: Occupation VERSUS THE STATE OF AP and 5 Ors. Represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar. 2:The Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : 3:The Director Age: 0 Occupation : 4:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : 5:Dorjee Sonam Age: 0 Occupation : Page No.# 2/3 6:Sherap Monpa Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : Marto Kato Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.