- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 9 September 2024
- Bench
- Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- IA(C) 160/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 10.09.2024 Heard Mr. D. Panging, learned counsel for the applicant/respondent No.1 and Mr. A. Tatak, learned counsel for the opposite party/petitioner. This is an application filed under Order XVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying for adjournment of the connected election petition for 15(fifteen) days for filing of the written statement. Mr. Tatak, learned counsel for the opposite party/petitioner has no objection to the present application seeking time to file the written statement. Having considered the grounds for seeking time to file the written statement and the objection not being raised by the opposite party/petitioner, I deem it appropriate to allow this application. Accordingly, the applicant/respondent No.1 is granted 15(fifteen) days time to file written statement. The I.A. stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040008762024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/160/2024 Dr Mohesh Chai Age: 51 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Tankakso Chai resident of T Chai residence Chai Colony Tezu PO and PS Tezu Lohit District Arunachal Pradesh 792001 VERSUS Karikho Kri Address:Son of Late Sotri Kri resident of Kri Niwas Telluliang Village PO and PS Tezu Lohit District Arunachal Pradesh 792001 ------------ Advocate for : Doge Lona Advocate for : Adam Tatak appearing for Karikho Kri: Advocate appearing for respectively. Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.