Taba Tahin and Anr v. Taba Tana

ORDER Date : 12.02.2024

None appears for the petitioners on call. Mr. X. Gyati, learned counsel for the sole respondent is present. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that as per order dated 06.09.2023, the petitioners were asked to pay the Page No.# 2/2 interim amount of Rs.20,000/- out of the decreetal amount within a month to the respondent. But the petitioners did not pay the said amount and they could not even appear before this court. It is further submitted that the petitioners remained absent without showing any ground. Therefore, he has prayed that the case may be disposed of by vacating the interim order. I have perused the record. It reveals that since after taking the advantage of the interim order, the petitioners remained absent before this Court without showing any ground. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent, the revision petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the interim order dated 06.09.2023 stands vacated. The revision petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040012182023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : CRP/48/2023 Taba Tahin and Anr. son of Late Taba Takhi, resident of Village- Tamang, P.O and P.S- Kheel/ Sagalee, Dist- Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Taba Rakesh Age: Occupation VERSUS Taba Tana resident of Tarajuli, P.O and P.S- Naharlagun, Dist- Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh. Advocate for the Petitioner : Teto Taba Advocate for the Respondent : Xavier Gyati BEFORE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI