Dabin Soki @ Tabin Soki v. Smti Yama Yekar

ORDER Date : 23.10.2024 Heard Ms T. Y. Bhutia, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms N. Danggen, learned counsel for the respondent.

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that while filing this present appeal, the decree was not available and subsequently, Page No.# 2/2 she has received the decree therefore, she may be allowed to withdraw the present second appeal with a liberty to file a fresh petition incorporating the decree passed.

The prayer is not opposed to by Ms N. Danggen, learned counsel for the respondent and therefore, the same stands allowed.

In view of the aforesaid, the present appeal stands closed on withdrawal with the liberty as prayed for.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040013742024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : RSA/3/2024 Dabin Soki @ Tabin Soki Son of Late Nada Soki, a resident of Prem Nagar (B-Sector) Naharlagun, PO and PS Naharlagun, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Smti Yama Yekar Wife of Tapu Yekar, Prem Nagar (B Sector) Naharlagun, PO and PS Naharlagun, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh. Advocate for the Petitioner : Muk Pertin, Senior Advocate, Nikita Danggen,M Pertin,Mudang Yubbey,Dusu Rillung,Tshering Yangzom Bhutia,Karyom Dabi Advocate for the Respondent : Puto Bui, Tashap Nima BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY