Tingnai Wangsa v. The State of Ap

ORDER Date : 30.10.2024

Heard Mr. T. Tapak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. L. Hage, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. By this application under Section 482 of Bhartia Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita

(BNSS),2023, the petitioner, namely, Shri Tingnai Wangsa, Seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with DML/PS/C/No. 06/2024 under Sections 74/155(2) of Page No.# 2/2 BNS, 2023. Pursuant to this Court order, dated 22.10.2024, the petitioner presented himself before the I.O. and the Case Diary produced by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor discloses that statement of the petitioner was recorded and he was thoroughly interrogated. There are no materials to suggest that the petitioner has tried to hamper or temper with any of the witnesses or tried to violate the conditions imposed while granting interim order by this Court under its order dated 22.10.2024. Perused the other materials available on record and the stage of investigation. After perusal of the same, this Court is of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary for the purpose of the investigation. Accordingly, interim order passed earlier dated 22.10.2024 is made absolute in the same terms and conditions. Case Diary be sent back.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040013802024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/129/2024 Tingnai Wangsa Son of Wangta Wangsa, Naitong village, Po and PS Borduria, Tirap District, Arunachal Pradesh and present address 33 Assam Rifles Company, Naginimora, Mon, Naginimora, Nagalang 798622 VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Tabit Tapak, Mrinal Kalita,T Tabing,Aso Dalbong,W Wangsu Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY