- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 12 December 2023
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- IA(C) 174/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 12.12.2023 Heard Mr. R. L. Thungon, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. N. Ratan, learned Addl. Advocate General for the opposite parties no. 3, 4 & 6 and Mr. O. Mibang, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 5 and Mr. H. K. Jamoh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 7 as well as Mr. T. T. Tara, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 8 to 26. This Interlocutory application, under Order I Rule 10(2) of Cr.P.C., has been filed by 43 nos. of applicants for impleading them as respondents no. 8 to 50 in WP(C)269/(AP)2023. Mr. Thungon, learned counsel for the applicants submit that impleadment of the applicants is very necessary on the ground they are Page No.# 10/10 necessary party in the writ petition No. WP(C)269/(AP)2023 and to dispose of the writ petition, they are required to be heard. The learned Addl. Advocate General submits that he has no any objection if the applicants are impleaded in the writ petition. Having heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and having considered the facts and circumstances on the record, this Interlocutory application is allowed and the applicants may be impleaded as respondents no. 8 to 50 in the writ petition. The Interlocutory application stands disposed of in terms above. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/10 GAHC040014512023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/174/2023 Shri Kessang Tashi and 42 Ors S/o Lt. Yeshi Gyatso, Village Shakyur, PO and PS Lumla, Dist. Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh, Mobile no. 8257005836 2: Thutan Choibey 3: Gentse Thinley 4: Lobsany Tsetan 5: Gom Norbu 6: Rinchin Gyatso 7: Lham Wangdi Page No.# 2/10 8: Lham Norbu 9: Sonam Tharchin 10: Kesang Doldon Damo 11: Kunjang Tsomu 12: Lham Drema 13: Koncho Lham 14: Gom Drema Drema 15: Sangey Tsomu Page No.# 3/10 16: Nima dorjee 17: Jamba Tsomu 18: Norbu Drema 19: Tsering Droma 20: Sonam Yeton 21: Sonam Paton 22: Rinchin drema 23: Tsering Jangmu Page No.# 4/10 24: Rhetar Wangchu 25: Tashi Tenzin 26: Tsering Dorjee 27: Sonam Namgey 28: Dawa Tsering 29: Thuten Pema 30: Tsering Tsomu 31: Leki Norbu Page No.# 5/10 32: 0Tenzing Chorup 33: TenzinDakpa 34: Kesang Drema 35: Dorjee Pema 36: Sonam Wangmu 37: Thutan Leki 38: Pem Tashi 39: Rinchin Tsering Page No.# 6/10 40: Tashi Wangdi 41: Thutan Choikey 42: Phurpa Tashi 43: Lobsang Darey Occupation VERSUS The State of AP and 25 Others Represented by Secretary (Land Management), Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:the Director (Land Management) Age: 0 3:the Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 4:the Additional Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 5:VKV Page No.# 7/10 Age: 0 6:the Assistant Engineer Age: 0 7:M/s Global Royal Construction Age: 0 8:Pandan Tsering Age: 30 9:Tsewang Tenzin Age: 34 10:Tsering Wanchu Age: 55 11:Lham Gyatsok Age: 43 12:Norbu Rapgey Age: 54 13:Tenzin Wangchak Age: 27 14:Choebay Rapten Age: 54 Page No.# 8/10 15:Sonam Jekme Age: 43 16:Jambey Tashi Age: 26 17:Thinley Zangmu Age: 51 18:Dorjee Drema Age: 48 19:Sonam Dorgey Age: 60 20:Pema Khandu Age: 53 21:Phurpa Rinchen Age: 44 22:Tashi Pema Age: 53 23:Rinchen Tsomu Age: 58 24:Tsering Norbu Age: 45 Page No.# 9/10 25:Ganden Chotten Age: 33 26:Kuncho Tsomu Age: 33 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : Rinchin Ledo Thungon Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.