VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Kento Eshi v. The State of Ap and 15 Ors

Dismissed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
31 October 2024
Bench
Budi Habungauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 489/2024

Judgment

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040014542024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/489/2024 Kento Eshi Son of Late Poken Eshi (Ori), resident of Keno Ori Market, Siyom Colony, Aalo, PO and PS Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.

VERSUS The State of AP and 15 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Secretary Land Management Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Deputy Commissioner Aalo 4:The Commanding Officer 4 JAK LI Aalo West Siang District 5:The DLRSO Aalo under Land Management Department Page No.# 2/4 6:The Defense Estate Officer Itanagar Papum Pare District 7:Gumsen Lollen Son of Late Tagum Lollen Panya Village Arunachal Pradesh Secretary of the PDBRATBC (Panya Dego Bogdo Rigo Along Town Boundary Committee) representing PDBRATBC 8:Gumi Lollen Son of Late Tagum Lollen 9:Dali Lollen Son of Late Hogda Lollen resident of Dego Village East Siang District 10:Poken Lollen Son of Late Mapo Lollen resident of Dego village Page No.# 3/4 11:Doli Lollen Son of Late Bedo Lollen resident of Bogdo village 12:Karik Lollen Son of Late Jumkar Lollen 13:Hengo Kamchi Son of Late Ishen Kamchi 14:Kage Ado Son of Late Reke Ado resident of Rigo village 15:Kirjum Ado Son of Late Gumkir Ado resident of Rigo village 16:Gumsen Lollen Page No.# 4/4 Son of Late Tugum Lollen Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Uttam Deka, Maji Dui,Wanglat Khomrang,M Lego,Nannu Yubi,Tame Rimi,Bomyom Ori,K Gara,Chorpok Modi Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), DSGI,Marto Kato,SC (Land Management),Dugmar Kamduk

-BEFORE-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

01.11.2024 Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition, with a liberty to file afresh, if so advised. Leave and liberty granted. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn, with a liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.