The Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission v. The Secretary, Home

ORDER Date : 21-03-2024 Vijay Bishnoi, CJ Despite service of notice upon the respondents No. 3 and 4, no one is appearing on behalf of them though the name of the counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents No. 3 and 4 is reflecting in the Cause-list. Even in second call, none has put in appearance. This Interlocutory Application is preferred on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to condone the delay of 9 (nine) days in filing the connected appeal. Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant and after going through the contents of the application, we deem it appropriate to allow the Interlocutory Application and condone the delay of 9 (Nine) days in filing the present appeal. Hence, the Interlocutory Application is allowed. List the connected appeal for Admission after a week. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040014632023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/176/2023 The Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (APPSC), represented by the Secretary, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The Secretary, Home Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 2:The Director General of Police Age: 0 Occupation : Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itnaagar 3:Joram Hania Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Joram Taka G-Extension Ganga Market Near SP Office Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 4:Deveso Chaitom Age: 0 Occupation : C/o Secretary APPSC Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar Advocate for the Petitioner : Ajin Apang, Sr. Advocate Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM