- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 22 January 2024
- Bench
- S.K.Medhi, Mitali Thakuria
- Case no.
- IA(Crl) 68/2022
Judgment
ORDER
23.01.2024
SK Medhi, J. Seen the Office Note dated 20.01.2024 which refers to a communication from the Officer-in-Charge, Manmow Police Station to the Addl. PP, AP whereby, Page No.# 2/3 it has been stated that the respondent no. 2 has been served. The respondent no. 2 is represented by Ms. T Jini, learned Addl. PP, AP. Accordingly, the service is deemed to be complete. Heard Shri K Lollen, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, who has filed this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 76 days in preferring the connected criminal appeal against the judgment dated 08.08.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Khonsa, Tirap in KSA/SC (POCSO) Case No. 30/2021. Shri Lollen, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant has referred to the averments made in paragraphs 6 and 7 of the application to explain the delay. Ms. Jini, learned Addl. PP submits that she will not have serious objection, in principle as the appeal is against an order of conviction. She, however, submits that in case the victim does not engage a counsel, a Legal Aid Counsel may be appointed. The said aspect would be considered at the appropriate stage. Considering the reasons cited and also taking into account that the appeal is against an order of conviction, the delay of 76 days is condoned. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands allowed and the delay is condoned. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. Page No.# 3/3 List the connected appeal for admission after 2 weeks.
Judge Judge Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040015772022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/68/2022 In Crl.A./43/2022 Nimkhil Jugli Son of Late Khabui Jugli, Resident of new Jukhi Village, P.O., Kantang, P.S. Manmao and District- Changlang, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS THE STATE OF AP and Anr. (Represented by the Public Prosecutor, Arunachal Pradesh.) 2:Manseng Mossang Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : A K Dasgupta Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.K.MEDHI HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.