VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Yurum Tamin and 6 Ors v. Romesh Maga

Dismissed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
3 December 2024
Bench
N. Unni Krishnan Nairauthor
Case no.
CRP 53/2024

Judgment

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040016542024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : CRP/53/2024 1:Yurum Tamin and 6 Ors Age: 38 Occupation : Address:Son of Shri Yurum Nilo resident of Tani Happa PO and PS Banderdewa Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Lingdom Kioda Age: 32 Occupation : Address:Son of Shri Lingdom Balley resident of 6th Mile Modirijo Itanagar Po and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Lokam Andrew Tajo Age: 28 Occupation : Address:Son of Shri Lokam Sangma resident of Pachin Colony PO and PS Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 4: Techi Sanjay Age: 35 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Techi Tania permanent resident of Rayung Village Page No.# 2/3 Po and PS Palin Kra Daadi District Arunachal Pradesh and presently residing at F Sector near Lucy Girls Hostel Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 5: Shri Tadar Baro Age: 36 Occupation : Address:Son of Tadar Tame resident of Nyapin PO and PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. 6: Akiong Yangfo Age: 40 Occupation : Address:C/o Shri Tadung Yangfo resident of BB Plaza D Sector PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 7: Nabam Dodum Age: 39 Occupation : Address:Son of Shri Nabam Takia resident of Chimpu Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Romesh Maga Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Shri Tekir Maga resident of Dokum Village PO and PS Raga Kamle District Arunachal Pradesh. Page No.# 3/3

------------ Advocate for : Adam Tatak Advocate for : Takam Sunil appearing for Romesh Maga: Advocate appearing for respectively.

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 04-12-2024 Mr. M. Kato, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits, on instructions, that he be permitted to allowed to withdraw the instant civil revision petition. Prayer is not being objected to by the learned counsel for the respondent. In view of the above, the civil revision petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. The interim directions passed vide order dated 26.11.2024 shall stand vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.