Rajen Gyadi v. The State of Ap

ORDER Date : 12-12-2024 Hear Mr. T. Gyadi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.

¶2The present application has been instituted by the applicant praying for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, in connection with Itanagar P.S. Case No. 223/2024, under Sections Page No.# 2/3 126(2)/118(1)/351(2)/3(5)/409 of the BNS.

¶3This Court vide order dated 04.12.2024, enlarged the petitioner on interim pre-arrest bail of Rs.10,000/- with surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. In terms of the directions so passed by this Court, the applicant had appeared before the Investigating Officer on 06.12.2024 and his statement was recorded.

¶4Today, when the matter was taken up, the up-dated case diary was placed before this Court along with a forwarding note dated 06.12.2024 of the I.O. wherein, it has been stated that the investigation of the case is complete and accordingly, the interim bail granted hereby be made absolute.

¶5In view of the above position, the interim pre-arrest bail as granted by this Court vide order dated 04.12.2024, is hereby made absolute, subject to the following conditions;

i) the applicant shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer, in the event, any further particulars or materials is so required from him.

ii) the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or, to any police officer.

¶6Accordingly, bail application stands disposed of.

Case diary so furnished is returned to Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Page No.# 3/3 Public Prosecutor.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040016722024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/138/2024 Rajen Gyadi Son of Shri Takang Gyadi, a permanent resident of Village Dokre, PO Gyawepurung, PS Chayang Tajo, East Kameng District, and presently residing at Doimukh, PO and PS Doimukh, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Tabo Gyadi, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR