Om Prakash v. The Hptdcl

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Execution Petition Nos.951 to 955, 957 to

961, 1298, 1301, 1337 of 2024, CMP-21772

of 2025 in EX.P.-1236 of 2024, CMP-22174

of 2025 in EX.P.-1164 of 2024, EX.P.-1116

of 2025 in CWP-273 of 2024, EX.P.-1965 of

2025 in CWP-6773 of 2024, EX.P.-1966 of

2025 in CWP-9496 of 2023, EX.P.-2350 of

2025 in CWP-5767 of 2024 Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 _______________________________________________________

¶1Ex. Petition No.951 of 24 Govind Ram

¶2Ex. Petition No.952 of 24 Tek Singh

¶3Ex. Petition No.953 of 24 Hira Singh

¶4Ex. Petition No.954 of 24 Chander Mani

¶5Ex. Petition No.955 of 24 Devi Chand

¶6Ex. Petition No.957 of 24 Fateh Chand

¶7Ex. Petition No.958 of 24 Mehar Chand

¶8Ex. Petition No.959 of 24 Rattan Chand

¶9Ex. Petition No.960 of 24 Trilok Chand

¶10Ex. Petition No.961 of 24 Revat Ram

¶11Ex. Petition No.1298 of 24 Chaman Lal

¶12Ex. Petition No.1301 of 24 Parkash Chand

¶13Ex. Petition No.1337 of 24 Roshan Lal

¶14CMP No.21772 of 2024 in Ex. Petition No.1236 of 2024 Dharam Pal Sharma

¶15CMP No.22174 of 2025 in Ex. Petition No.1164 of 2024 Om Prakash

¶16Ex. Petition No.1116 of 2025 Tara Chand

¶17Ex. Petition No.1965 of 2025 Jaswant Singh

¶18Ex. Petition No.1966 of 2025 Sudershan Kumar

¶19Ex. Petition No.2350 of 2025

Thakur Chand

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting? 1

For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate.

For the Respondent(s): Ms. Suchita Kaintura, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):

Affidavit in compliance to order dated 26.08.2026 passed in Execution Petition No. 951 of 2024 along with Execution Petitions No. 952 to 955 and 957 to 961 of 2024 stands filed, perusal whereof reveals that in terms of the judgment sought to be executed, respondent-Corporation has released the entire retirement benefits of the petitioners, i.e. gratuity and leave encashment. It has been further stated in the compliance affidavit that arrears of revised pay scale, DA and IR have also been released in favour of the petitioners.

2.

In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed, reserving liberty to the petitioners to get the execution petitions revived in case the amount is not yet credited to their bank account.

(Sandeep Sharma),

Judge September 24, 2026 (sunil)

Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?