VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Jammu and Kashmir High Court 2025 › High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh

Rafiq Ahmad Bhat v. J and K Board for Specified Wakfs and Ors

Disposed Off
Court
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
Decided
14 May 2025
Bench
Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge
Case no.
WP(C) 1099/2025

Follow Jammu and Kashmir High CourtFollow Wasim Sadiq NargalFollow Judge

Judgment

ORDER

14.05.2025

¶01The petitioner through the medium of the instant petition, has called in question the impugned recovery notice dated 22nd April, 2025 issued by the Executive Magistrate, Tehsildar, J&K Waqf Board, to the petitioner by virtue of which, arrears amounting to Rs. 9,77,819/- on account of user charge of a notified waqf property hall in 3rd floor of Boulevard Shopping Complex at Boulevard Road, Srinagar, have been shown outstanding against the petitioner.

¶02On the asking of the Court, Mr. Mohammad Iqbal Dar, learned counsel caused appearance on behalf of respondents.

¶03The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit 50% of the outstanding amount before the respondent No. 3, within a period of four

weeks and he also undertakes to deposit the rest of the amount within a period of two months thereafter. He further submits that the petitioner will submit an undertaking before the respondent No. 3 insofar as balance 50% of the amount is concerned.

¶04In the light of the assurance extended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner will deposit 50% of the amount before the respondent No. 3, within a period of four weeks and shall also submit an undertaking before the respondent No. 3 to the effect that the petitioner will deposit the balance 50% within a period of two months thereafter, to which Mr. Mohammad Iqbal Dar, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection, as such, no fruitful purpose would be achieved by keeping the instant writ petition pending.

¶05Accordingly, the instant writ petition is taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties and is accordingly disposed of at its threshold in the following manner:

(i) The petitioner shall deposit 50% of the outstanding amount before the respondent No. 3, within a period of four weeks from today and the petitioner is further directed to submit an undertaking before the respondent No. 3 to the effect that he will

deposit the balance 50% within a period of two months thereafter.

(ii) Subject to petitioner depositing 50% of the outstanding amount before the respondent No. 3 within a period of four weeks from today and filing of an undertaking to deposit the balance 50% amount within two months thereafter, the respondents are restrained to initiate coercive measures against the petitioner. It is made clear that in case the aforesaid amount is not deposited within the prescribed time and the undertaking not filed, then the respondents shall be at liberty to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law and recover the amount being payable by taking all coercive measures.

¶06With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of along with all connected application(s).

(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)

Judge SRINAGAR:

14.05.2025 "HAMID"

Case details

Parties and counsel

Serial No. 184 SUPPLEMENTARY CAUSE LIST-I HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1099/2025 CM(2907/2025) Rafiq Ahmad Bhat. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bilal Ahmad Khan, Advocate. Vs. J and K Board for Specified Wakfs & Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Mohammad Iqbal Dar, Advocate. CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.

Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.