VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Jammu and Kashmir High Court 2026 › High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh

M/S Srishti Constructions Th Rajesh Kumar v. Ut of J and K Th Commissioner Secretary, Public Works (R and B) Department, Jammu and Others

Disposed Off
Court
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
Decided
1 April 2026
Bench
M. A. Chowdhary, Judge
Case no.
WP(C) 788/2026

Follow Jammu and Kashmir High CourtFollow M. A. ChowdharyFollow Judge

Judgment

ORDER (01.04.2026)

¶01Petitioner, through the medium of this petition, seeks direction upon the respondents to release the outstanding admitted amount of ₹19,88,294/- i.e., ₹6,83,400/- towards mechanical work and ₹13,04,894/-, towards Serial No. 127

electric work in his favour, with further direction to the respondents to return/release the security deposit of ₹1,11,06,000/-, as the petitioner has successfully completed the allotted work of the respondents, to their entire satisfaction.

¶02Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No. 3 had issued E-NIT No. MCD-52 of 2018-19 dated 02.08.2018 inviting tenders for the work of construction of 'Bone & Joint Hospital' at Bakshi Nagar, Jammu at an estimated cost of ₹4232.00 lacs, with bid submission period from 03.08.2018 to 16.08.2018 and the petitioner, being fully eligible and technically qualified, participated in the tender process and was declared L-1 (lowest bidder). Consequently, the work was allotted vide Order No. CEJ/G/15502-04, dated 19.12.2018 for a contract value of ₹38,18,91,545/-, after execution of an agreement between the parties in December, 2018.

¶03Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner commenced and executed the work in terms of the contract. However, during execution, the work was adversely impacted due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in nationwide lockdowns, suspension of construction activity, labour shortages, and disruption of supply chains, which were beyond the control of the petitioner. Despite such impediments, the petitioner completed the entire project on

20.04.2023 in accordance with specifications and to the satisfaction of the respondents.

¶04It is contended that although the respondents have released payments of running account bills from time to time, they have failed to release the admitted dues of final bill of mechanical work: ₹6,83,400/-,final bill of electrical work: ₹13,04,894/- and refund of security deposit: ₹1,11,06,000/-, total amount due is ₹1,30,94,294/-.

¶05It is submitted that the aforesaid amounts are admitted and undisputed, and are not subject to any adjudication, inquiry, or recovery proceedings. It is also submitted that no defect liability or penalty has been imposed upon the petitioner, nor has any adverse communication been issued by the respondents. Despite several representations and even serving a legal notice, the respondents have failed to release the admitted dues, prejudicial to the financial interests of the petitioner.

¶06Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall be satisfied in case the petition is disposed of, at this state with a direction to the respondents to consider the release of the afore-stated admitted liability.

¶07Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents shall not be averse to the consideration of the release of admitted and due liabilities in favour of the petitioner, in accordance with rules/regulations and in terms of contract.

¶08In view of the pleadings and submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of at this motion stage with a direction to the respondents to consider to make payment of the admitted liability, subject to verification to the petitioner in terms of the contract

and rules/regulations within a period of six months from the date, a certified copy of this order is made available to them.

¶09Disposed of along with connected application(s).

(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE

Jammu

01.04.2026 Renu

Case details

Parties and counsel

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C ) No. 788/2026 CM No. 1789/2026 M/S Srishti Constructions SCO No. 02 3rd Floor PUDA Complex Ladowali Road Jalandhar City Through its partner Rajesh Kumar, S/O Sh. Madan Lal R/O 347-348 New Jawahar Nagar, Jalandhar, Punjab. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Sumir Pandita, Advocate. V/s 01. U.T of J&K through Commissioner/Secretary, Public Works Department (R&B), Civil Secretariat, Jammu. 02. Commissioner/Secretary, Health & Medical Education Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu. 03. Chief Engineer, PWD, (R&B), Jammu. 04. Superintending Engineer, PWD (R&B), Circle North Jammu. 05. Executive Engineer, PWD (R&B), Tawi Bridge/Medical College Division, Jammu. 06. Director Health Services Jammu. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE

Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.