VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Jammu and Kashmir High Court 2026 › High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh

Yash Pal and Others v. U T of J and K Th Financial Commissioner Revenue Deptt and Others

Disposed Off
Court
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
Decided
20 May 2026
Bench
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi, Judge
Case no.
WP(C) 2859/2022

Follow Jammu and Kashmir High CourtFollow Moksha Khajuria KazmiFollow Judge

Judgment

ORDER

¶1By this petition, petitioners herein have challenged order dated

21.12.2022 passed by respondent No.1, Financial Commissioner (Revenue), under Agrarian Reforms Act, J&K, whereby Order/Reference dated 23.03.2022 made by Additional Commissioner Jammu (with powers of Divisional Commissioner) against the order of Deputy Commissioner (Collector) Kathua dated 27.12.2019, has been set aside, thereby resulting into cancellation of Mutation No.25 dated 27.03.2018, and the matter has been remanded to Tehsildar Kathua for passing fresh order/Mutation after the death of the grand-father of the petitioners herein.

¶2It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in terms of Mutation No.25 dated 27.03.2018, the petitioners have been vested with exclusive ownership in respect of land which was bequeathed to them, on the basis of will deed duly executed by their late grand-father in respect of a specific portion of land measuring 53 kanals and 8 marlas, which was the exclusive and self owned property of the deceased grandfather of the petitioners.

¶3Affidavit dated 03.05.2024 stands filed on behalf of private respondents 2 to 5, wherein, it is averred that Mutation No.25, of village Kore Qasba, Tehsil Hiranagar, District Kathua was attested in favour of Yash Pal, Raj Kumar, Gopal Dass, sons of Sh. Tara Chand and Surinder Kumar, son of Sh. Dev Raj, R/O Village Kore Qasba, Tehsil Hiranagar, District Kathua, on the basis of the will deed, which is valid in law, as the same has been duly attested by the Revenue Officer.

¶4Private respondents, are on affidavit to state that they have no objection, in case, the instant petition is allowed, by setting aside the impugned order dated

21.12.2022, passed by respondent No.1-Financial Commissioner, Revenue under Agrarian Reforms Act.

¶5In view of the aforesaid submissions and affidavit filed on behalf of private respondents 2 to 5, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the impugned order dated 21.12.2022 passed by respondent No.1 is set aside. As a result, order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Jammu with powers of Divisional Commissioner, Jammu is upheld, consequently, Mutation No.25 dated 27.03.2018 shall stand upheld.

¶6With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge

JAMMU

20.05.2026 Raj Kumar

Case details

Parties and counsel

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Decided on:20.05.2026. Uploaded on: 21.05.2026. WP(C) No. 2859/2022 CM No. 7942/2022 1. Yash Pal, Age 45 years S/O Sh. Tara Chand, R/O Village Kore, Qasba Tehsil Hiranagar, District Kathua. 2. Raj Kumar, Age 40 years S/O Tara Chand, R/O Village Kore, Qasba Tehsil Hiranagar, District Kathua. 3. Gopal Dass, Age 38 years S/O Tara Chand, R/O Village Kore, Qasba Tehsil Hiranagar, District Kathua. 4. Surinder Kumar, Age 36 years S/O Dev Raj R/O Village Kore, Qasba Tehsil Hiranagar, District Kathua. .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through :- Mr. Saqib Javeed Khan, Advocate. v/s 1. UT of J&K through Financial Commissioner (Revenue) Revenue Department Civil Secretariat, Jammu. 2. Bansil Lal, S/O Jagan Nath R/O Village Kore, Qasba Tehsil Hiranagar, District Kathua 3. Som Raj S/O Jagan Nath R/O Village Kore, Qasba Tehsil Hiranagar, District Kathua. 4. Tilak Raj S/O Jagan Nath, R/O Village Kore, Qasba Tehsil Hiranagar, District Kathua. 5. Guddo Devi D/O Jagan Nath W/O Nathu Ram R/O Dhaloti These Marheen District Kathua .....Respondent(s) Sr. No. 131 Through :- Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-1. Mr. Abid Khan, Advocate for R-2 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE

Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.