- Court
- High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
- Decided
- 21 October 2023
- Bench
- Sindhu Sharma, Judge, Mohan Lal
- Case no.
- LPAOW 5/2011
Follow Jammu and Kashmir High CourtFollow Sindhu SharmaFollow JudgeFollow Mohan Lal
Judgment
ORDER
21.10.2023
¶01The appellant has approached this Court in a writ petition bearing OWP No. 170/2008 seeking a direction to the respondents to change the alignment of Gladny Transmission Line at Tower No. 127 of 220 KV Gladny-Udhampur Transmission Line, situated at Village Dalah, 4th No. Tower, i.e., from Grid Station, Udhampur. A further direction was also sought for not laying the transmission line over the houses of the inhabitants of Village Dalah, near Housing Colony, Udhampur on the Gladny-Udhampur Transmission Line Tower No. 127 situated at Village Dalah, Udhampur, i.e., 4th No. Tower from Grid Station Udhampur.
¶02This writ petition was heard and dismissed vide judgment and order dated 01.02.2011 by holding that: "In the present case, even though there is no threat to the life of the petitioners, the laying down of the Transmission Line over an aerial LPA (OW) No. 05/2011
space is not likely to cause any threat to the life of the petitioners. If there is any mishap or negligence in this behalf, the petitioner will be well within their rights to claim compensation for the same. In view of what has been said above, I do not find any substance in this writ petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed.
Interim directions issued shall stand vacated."
¶03The appellants, aggrieved of the order of the learned Single Judge dated 01.02.2011, preferred the present appeal for setting aside the same. Vide interim order dated 14.02.2011, notice was issued and it was observed that except supplying energy in all the transmission lines, the respondents are allowed to carry out all other activities with regard to stringing of transmission lines.
¶04During the pendency of this appeal, the parties have entered into an amicable settlement with each other.
¶05Mr. Bavinder Kundal, Chief Engineer, JKPTCL, PDD, Jammu, is present in person and has submitted that they have conducted a survey for shifting/re-routing of sub judice section of line and, accordingly, after following due course of procedure, re-routing of line was planned and Letter of Award was awarded on 15.06.2021. The portion of 220 KV in the disputed area is still un-energized and shall be energized after re-aligning though new route and dismantling of disputed portion will be done after energization. It is also stated in the said communication that the shifting work is under progress and turnkey contractor is directed to complete the work at the earliest. LPA (OW) No. 05/2011
¶06The communication dated 21.07.2023, produced by Mr. Ravinder Gupta, learned AAG, is taken on record.
¶07In view of the statement of Chief Engineer and the communication dated 21.07.2023, the grievance of the appellant stands redressed and the LPA is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Mohan Lal) (Sindhu Sharma)
Judge
Judge
Jammu:
21.10.2023 Michal Sharma
Case details
Parties and counsel
Sr. No. 04 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU LPAOW No. 05/2011 Neelam Raj Baigra and others …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. K.S. Johal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Supreet Singh Johal, Advocate. V/s State of J&K and others …..Respondent(s) Through:- Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG. CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL, JUDGE
Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.