- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 23 February 2026
- Bench
- P.B. Balaji
- Case no.
- CRP 859/2026
Judgment
O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and perused the materials available on record.
¶2The revision petitioners are the plaintiffs, who filed O.S.No.76 of 2012 seeking partition and separate possession of their mother's estate. The Trial Court decreed the suit, negativing the defence set up by the defendant (since deceased), and passed a preliminary decree declaring 3/4th share in favour of the Petitioners. Aggrieved thereby, the defendant preferred A.S. No.1 of 2018 on the file of the learned I Additional District Court, Tindivanam. Pending the appeal, the matter was referred to Lok Adalat and an Award came to be passed in LAC No. 657 of 2019 dated
28.11.2019, recording settlement between the parties.
¶3The case of the petitioners is that the brother of the defendant had induced them to enter into the compromise on the promise of payment of certain sums of money in lieu of their relinquishing their share. According to the petitioners, after signing the compromise, the said promise was not honoured and the amounts agreed upon were not paid.
¶4The Award of the Lok Adalat having been passed on 28.11.2019, this Court is unable to entertain the present Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The allegations made by the petitioners, including fraud and non-payment of the agreed consideration, are matters which require adjudication on evidence. Whether there was any misrepresentation or default on the part of the respondents after the settlement, as recorded in the Lok Adalat Award, are all questions of fact that necessitate a full-fledged trial.
5.In such view of the matter, this Court does not find the present Civil Revision Petition to be maintainable. It is open to the petitioners to work out their remedies by instituting a separate civil suit in the manner known to law.
¶6In the result, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.
23.02.2026 Index : Yes/No
: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking Order
kv To The Principal Subordinate Court, Villupuram.
P.B.BALAJI, J. kv
23.02.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 23.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI Pachaiyammal (Deceased) 1. Ganaga 2. Komala (Cause title accepted vide Court order dated 21.01.2026 made in CMP.No.867 of 2026 in CRP.No.674 of 2026) 3. Mani 4. Anandhi (Petitioners 3 & 4 are the LR of the (deceased) 1st plaintiff Pachaiyammal) ... Petitioners Vs. Vijayakumar (Deceased) 1. Vimala 2. Karthiga 3. Guna 4. Prabavathi 5. Monisha ... Respondents Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the award passed in L.A.C.No.657 of 2019 in A.S.No.1 of 2018 dated 28.11.2019 on the file of the 1st Additional District Sessions Court, Trindivanam and restore the First Appeal in A.S.No.1 of 2018 to file for hearing and disposal according to law. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Natarajan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.