VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ramlord Apparels Limited v. M/S Gangotri Textiles Limited

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 March 2026
Bench
K.Kumaresh Babuauthor
Case no.
AS 536/2013

Judgment

JUDGMENT The instant appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2013 made in O.S.No.46 of 2010 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore.

¶2Heard Mr.T.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶3In spite of notice having been served on respondents 1 and 2 and their names also having been printed in the cause list today, there is no representation on the side of the respondents 1 and 2.

¶4The status of the respondent company had been recorded as been struck off in the portal of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. In such view of the matter, there shall be no useful purpose in adjudicating the present lis.

¶5It has also been brought on record that the respondent company had also been subjected to liquidation proceedings and had been liquidated, wherein there had not been any claim against the appellant herein for the monies that had been granted in his favour. Page3 of 5

¶6From the facts that have been indicated, it is could only be presumed that the respondent, who had the benefit of the money decree against the appellant, had not taken any steps for recovery of dues under the decree and, as of this date, the respondent has also been struck off from the Register of the Companies and hence, the decree that had been passed against the appellant could also not be executed as the respondent is no more a juristic entity to claim the relief.

¶7The Court has also queried as to whether the respondent had filed any Execution Petition, to which an answer was made in the negative, indicating that no execution proceedings had been initiated. The respondent, who had been proceeded with in the insolvency proceedings, had also not shown the appellant to be a debtor to it and no proceedings for adjudication of the debt that has also been made against the appellant.

¶8In such an event, this Court is not inclined to adjudicate the lis, which had become deadwood, as no claims could also be made based upon the decree, which is impugned in this appeal. Page4 of 5

¶9For the aforesaid reasons, this appeal suit stands closed. No costs. 23-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order kak To

1.The IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore.

¶2The Official Assignee The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai.

¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. ASoNo.o536oofo2013 K.KUMARESHoBABU,oJ. kak ASoNo.o536oofo2013 23-03-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Ramlord Apparels Limited 9/10, Akurli Industrial Estate Akurli Rd, Kandivilli East, Mumbai. ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. M/s Gangotri Textiles Limited Factory Unit III, SIPCOT Industrial Growth Centre, Perundurai, Erode District, Rep By Its Manager S. Mutukumarasamy S/o.Subramaniam Office at Old No.35, New No. 42, Robertson Road, R.S Puram, Coimbatore – 2. 2. The Official Assignee The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai. (R2 is impleaded vide order of Court dated 10.03.2025 made in CMP.NO.14767 of 2024 in AS.No.536 of 2013) ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Appeal suit filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to set aside the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2013 made in O.S.No.46 of 2010 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore. For Appellant(s): Mr.T.Balaji For Respondent(s): No appearance Page2 of 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.