VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Favouv Oke v. Union of India

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 March 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 959/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on Page2 of 4

06.09.2023 for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 21(C), 22(C), 28 and 29(1) of NDPS Act in R.R. No.24 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is on 06.09.2023 at around 6.30 hours, based on a secret information, when the respondent police conducted search at SPS Travel bus entered in the Omni bus stand at Koyambedu, the petitioner along with other accused were in collective possession of 7.45 grams of Cocaine, 7.20 grams of MDMA, 407 grams of Amphetamine, 138 grams of MDMA, 601 grams of Amphetamine and 172 grams of MDMA. Hence the case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been under long incarceration since

06.09.2023 and she is ready and willing to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court and prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶4The learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police strongly opposed to enlarge the petitioner on bail and has filed a counter stating that there are three accused involved in this case and 46 grams of blue colour diamond shaped tablets (MDMA pills) have been recovered from this Page3 of 4 petitioner and the same would come under the commercial quantity. Therefore, there is bar under Section 37(1)(2)(b) of NDPS Act. Apart from that, the petitioner is a Nigerian national and therefore, if she is enlarged on bail, there is every possibility of absconding.

¶5From the submissions made by the learned Special Public Prosecutor that commercial quantity of contraband has been seized from the petitioner, this Court could not find any reason to overcome the rigors under Section 37 of NDPS Act and also this Court could not find any material in this petition. In view of the same, it is not desirable to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶6Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 12-03-2026 MJS Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. Page4 of 4

C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MJS To

¶1The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶2The Jr.Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Chennai-77. 12-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Favouv Oke D/o.Oke, R/o.111, Green Garden Layout, 1st Floor, Bidarahalli Village, Bangalore, Permanent Address Binny EDO State, Sobe, Nigeria. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Union Of India represented by The Jr.Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Chennai-77. RR.No.24/2023. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner/accused-4 on bail pending trial in C.C.No.203/2024 in RR.No.24/2023 on the file of Honble II Additional Special Court for Exclusive trial of cases under NDPS Act at Chennai. For Petitioner(s): No appearance. For Respondent(s): Mr N.P. Kumar, Special Public Prosecutor[FOR NCB CASES]

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.