Venkateshappa v. M/S Coramandal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-08-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND CMA NO. 1172 OF 2005,CMA NO. 1173 OF 2005,CMA NO. 1174 OF 2005,CMA NO. 1181 OF 2005,CMA NO. 1182 OF 2005,CMA NO. 1183 OF 2005,CMA NO. 1177 OF 2005,CMA NO. 1178 OF 2005,CMA NO. 1179 OF 2005,CMA NO. 1180 OF 2005,CMA NO. 1175 OF 2005,CMA NO. 1176 OF 2005

¶1VENKATESHAPPA S/o. Ramaiah Machigiri Village Vs CMA No. 1172 of 2005

¶1SHIVAPPA S/o. Gangappa Soolakunta Village Soolakunta Post Dhenkanikottai Tk Vs CMA No. 1173 of 2005

¶1Minor Sumitha Rep By Fater Sivappa. Soolakunta Post, Dhenkanikotai Tk Dharmapuri Dist. Vs CMA No. 1174 of 2005

¶1KAMALA Late Rangappa Kotaiyur Village Kotaiyur Village Kotaiyur Post, Dhenkanikotai Tk Dharmapuri Dist. Vs CMA No. 1181 of 2005

¶1VENGATESH S/o. Ramanujaiah Manjigiri Village, Vs CMA No. 1182 of 2005

¶1UTCHAPPA S/o. Velasalappa, Madakkal Village Vs CMA No. 1183 of 2005

¶1SIDDAGOWDA S/o Marigowda Madakkal Village, Vs CMA No. 1177 of 2005

¶1ANGACHARI S/o. Anbchari Matakkal Village, Vs CMA No. 1178 of 2005

¶1MUNIRAJ S/o. Achappa Soolakunta Post, Dhenkanikotai Tk Dharmapuri Dist. Vs CMA No. 1179 of 2005

¶1MANJUNATH S/o. Krihsnamoorthy Manjigiri Village, Vs CMA No. 1180 of 2005

¶1MANGAMMA W/o. Sivappa Soolakunta Post, Dhenkanikotai Tk Dharmapuri Dist. Vs CMA No. 1175 of 2005

¶1RANGAMMA D/o. Hanumaiah Soolakunta Village . Soolakunta Post, Dhenkanikotai Tk Vs CMA No. 1176 of 2005

¶1SUDALAKSHMAMMA S/o.Vengatesh Madakkal Village Vs For Appellant(s): Mr.Pa.Sudeshkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Manohar For R1 (in All R2 Given Up (in All) COMMON ORDER When the matter taken up for hearing the learned counsel for the claimant submits that on 18.06.2019 they were not been heard but the appeals were closed as if matter was settled but as on date the claimant have not received any compensation. Besides, they contested the dismissal order passed by the tribunal against six claims enhanced and one claim dismissed.

¶2The learned counsel for the respondent submits that according to his instruction the claimants/appellants have received amount through execution proceedings. By way of reply, the learned counsel for the appellants submit that it is batch of cases in some of the cases injured persons were received compensation through execution proceedings but not the present claimants/appellants, thus there was mistaken representation.

¶3On perusal of records, it reveal that on the date of disposal of the said appeals there was no representation on the side of the claimants/appellants and the cases also not settled in Lok Adalat. In order to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and in the interest of justice, this Court is inclined to recall the judgement dated 18.06.2019. Post the matter on 17.10.2025. 25-08-2025 pbl Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes CMAeNo.e1171eofe2005 T.V.THAMILSELVIoJ. oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopbl CMAoNo.o1171oofo2005 ANDoCMAoNO.o1172oOFo 2005,CMAoNO.o1173oOFo 2005,CMAoNO.o1174oOFo 2005,CMAoNO.o1181oOFo 2005,CMAoNO.o1182oOFo 2005,CMAoNO.o1183oOFo 2005,CMAoNO.o1177oOFo 2005,CMAoNO.o1178oOFo 2005,CMAoNO.o1179oOFo 2005,CMAoNO.o1180oOFo 2005,CMAoNO.o1175oOFo 2005,CMAoNO.o1176oOFo 2005 25-08-2025