VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Tvl D and A Events v. The State Tax Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 February 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 3317/2026

Judgment

Order Mr. TNC.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondent. Page2 of 5

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent.

¶3In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 19.08.2024 whereby the demand proposed in the Show cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 10.05.2024 has been confirmed.

¶4A reading of the impugned order and the aforesaid Show Cause Notice indicates that the petitioner has been denied Input Tax Credit under Section 16 on the ground of delay in availing the Input Tax Credit, by invoking Section 16

(4) of the respective GST Enactments.

¶5Post facto, after the impugned order was passed, there has been a statutory intervention by way of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 (15 of 2024) dated 16.08.2024, with effect from 27.09.2024 vide S.O.4253 (E), with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017.

¶6Following the consistent view taken by this Court under similar circumstances, the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order on merits, subject to the Petitioner filing a reply to the Show Cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 10.05.2024 together with requisite documents to Page3 of 5 substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 19.08.2024 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 10.05.2024, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7The respondent shall thereafter pass appropriate orders after satisfying that the petitioner has otherwise complied with the requirements of Section 16 and other relevant provisions of the GST Enactments for availing the Input Tax Credit.

¶8In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶9Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶10This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 10-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order AV/dpa Page4 of 5 To The State Tax Officer ValluvarKottam Assessment Circle, No.1, PAPJM Annex Building Sixth Floor, Room No.604, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. WPoNo.o3317oofo2026 C.SARAVANANoJ. AV/dpa WPoNo.o3317oofo2026 and WMPoNos.o3756oando3757oofo2026 10-02-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos. 3756 and 3757 of 2026 Tvl. D and A Events, Rep. by its Partner Mohan Daniel, No.1 A, Baba Towers, Second Floor, Sterling Road, Sterling Avenue, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. ..Petitioner Vs The State Tax Officer ValluvarKottam Assessment Circle, No.1, PAPJM Annex Building Sixth Floor, Room No.604, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. ..Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records of the Respondent in his proceedings in GSTIN/33AADFD0571G1ZXL/2019-20 dated 19.08.2024 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr. P. R. Kumar For Respondent : Mr.TNC.Kaushik, Addl. Govt. Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.