VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

G.Vijaya v. E.Nithya

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 August 2025
Bench
P.B. Balajiauthor
Case no.
CRP 244/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.B. Balaji

Judgment

ORDER The present revision petition has been filed seeking quashment of the order dated 29.11.2024 made in I.A.No.3 of 2024 in O.S.No.119 of 2013 on the file of the learned XI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶2Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned counsel for the 3rd and 4th respondents.

¶3The petition under Section 10 r/w 151 of CPC was taken out by the revision petitioners in I.A.No.3 of 2024. The suit in O.S.No.119 of 2013 has been filed for declaration of the sale deed executed by the respondents 1 & 2/defendants 1 & 2 in the suit in favour of the 3rd defendant as null and void on the ground that, fraud has been played and Page No.2 of 6 that on the basis of the forged WILL dated 23.02.2013 and consequent probate obtained in O.P.No.920 of 2005, the property has been dealt with.

¶4It is admitted that testamentary original suit in T.O.S.No.10 of 2013 was pending concerning the said WILL dated 23.02.2013 in O.P.No.920 of 2005 (converted as TOS.No.920 of 2005, pursuant to the caveat filed by the interested respondents). It is seen that the said TOS was subsequently dismissed, as against which, an appeal has been preferred in O.S.A.No.28 of 2022 and the said appeal is admittedly pending before the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court. Only in order to await final decision in O.S. Appeal, an application for stay under Section 10 of CPC was filed.

¶5No doubt, as contended by the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent as well as the learned trial Judge, no stay has been granted in OSA.No.28 of 2022. However, the fact remains that the decision in Page No.3 of 6 OSA.No.28 of 2022 would have a direct bearing on the present civil suit in O.S.No.119 of 2013 which is filed seeking declaration, based on the WILL and Sale deed executed thereupon.

¶6In the light of the above, I am inclined to allow this revision petition and accordingly, this Civil revision petition stands allowed and the order dated 29.11.2024 made in I.A.No.3 of 2024 in O.S.No.119 of 2013 is set aside. The suit in O.S.No.119 of 2013 shall stand stayed till final disposal of OSA.No.28 of 2022. It is open to the parties to approach the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court to seek for expeditious listing and disposal of the said OSA. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.

07.08.2025 skt Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No Page No.4 of 6 To

¶1The XI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶2The Sub Registrar, Royapuram, Chennai. Page No.5 of 6 CRP.No.244oofo2025 Poo.B.oBALAJI,ooJ. skt CRP.No.244oofo2025 and CMP.No.1582oofo2025

07.08.2025 PageoNo.6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.08.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and CMP.No.1582 of 2025 1. G.Vijaya 2. T.Meenakshi ...Petitioners Vs. 1. E.Nithya 2. K.Madanprabhu 3. R.Parthiban 4. The Sub Registrar, Royapuram, Chennai. 5. C.Thiyagarajan 6. P.Siva ...Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 29.11.2024 made in I.A.No.3 of 2024 in O.S.No.119 of 2013 on the file of the XI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. Page No.1 of 6 For Petitioners : Mr.M.Imthias For Respondents : Mr.V.M.Venkatramana, for R3 Mr.A.Anandan, GA, for R4 No Appearance, for R1 & R2 Notice not ready, for R6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.