VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.Manoharan v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 February 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 3748/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application dated 06.10.2023 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted an online application on 06.10.2023 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Mr.Venkatatesa Perumal, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice on behalf of the fourth respondent.

4.No prejudice will be caused to the respondents 2 and 3 if the said authorities are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom they deem it fit. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners and also to any other party, whom they deem it fit to enquire.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 2 and 3 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the third respondent, the fourth respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 10-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

1.The District collector Salem District, Salem

2.The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office, Sankagiri, Salem District.

3.The Land Surveyor Tahsildar Office Campus, Sankagiri Taluk, Salem District.

4.The Inspector of Police Snakagiri Police Station, Sankagiri, Salem District. ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

10-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. M.Manoharan Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Salem District, Salem 2.The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office, Sankagiri, Salem District. 3.The Land Surveyor Tahsildar Office Campus, Sankagiri Taluk, Salem District. 4.The Inspector of Police Snakagiri Police Station, Sankagiri, Salem District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 1 to 3rd respondents to survey the land and fixed the boundaries in survey No.251/1 situated at Koneripatti Village, Sankagiri Village, Salem District based on payment receipt E-Challan No.20231006025737 dated-06-10- 2023 with production of the 4th respondent For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Kalaiyarasan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For R1 to R3 Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Govt Advocate(Crl.Side) For R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.