VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

N.Subramanian v. The Managing Director

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 January 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 1838/2026

Judgment

ORDER The Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to pay 10% interest for the belated payment of terminal benefits such as Gratuity, Leave Salary, PF and Commutation of pension amount to the petitioners.

¶2Mr.A.Vinothraj, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the first respondent. Mr.C.S.K.Sathish, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the second respondent. In view of the consent expressed by the learned counsel on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶3It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioners, who had joined the services of the respondent Corporation, had already retired from service, however, the terminal benefits have been settled belatedly. Therefore, the petitioners claimed 10% interest on the belated payment of terminal benefits and they have also made representations to pay interest for the belated payment of terminal benefits which has not been evoked any response so far. Hence, the petitioners are before this Court.

¶4Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶5In view of the limited request made by the petitioners with regard to interest on the belated payment of terminal benefits, this Court directs the respondents to pay interest @ 6% for the belated payment of terminal benefits from the date of retirement till the date of actual disbursal of terminal benefits of the petitioners, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order taking into account the bank rate of interest on deposits.

¶6Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 27-01-2026 Anu (2/2) Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

1.The managing Director Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., Pallavan Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai-2.

2.The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transprot Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002. M.DHANDAPANI J. Anu

27-01-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI 1. N.Subramanian S/o.Natarajan, No.T2, third floor, Ragava Rams Jems Court, Cornet Block, Chennai-600 071. 2. J.Daniel Raj S/o.Jebamani, No.49, Kamaraj Nagar, 3rd Cross Street, Perungudi, Chennai-96 3. K.Mani S/o.Kannan, No.8/326, 194th Street, Muthamizh Nagar, Kodungaiyur, Chennai-600 118 4. D.Arivazhagan S/o.Dhatchinamoorthi, No.36, Eswaran Kovil Street, Acharapakkam, Chengalpattu 5. M.Selvaraju S/o.Manickam, No.17/8, Selliamman Kovil, 2nd Cross Street, East Tambaram, Chennai-59 6. A.Shanmugam S/o.Amavasai, No.8/11a, Erikarai Street, Pachaippan Colony, Jamin Pallavaram, Chennai-600 043. 7. S.Rajkumar S/o.Samikannu, No.33/17, Thulakanaththamman Kovil Street, Bharathi Nagar, Jamin Pallavaram, Chennai-43. 8. S.Arul Rajan So.Subramani, No.1553, Deivanai Street, Urappakkam, Chengalpattu. 9. B.Sambath S/o.Balaraman, No.109, Pallavan Street, Nariyambakkam Padappai. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Managing Director Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., Pallavan Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. 2.The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay interest of 10 percent to the petitioners for belated payment of Gratuity, Leave Salary, Provident fund and commutation of pension amounts within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): M/s.S.Sakthivel For Respondents: Mr.A.Vinothraj for R1 Mr.C.S.K.Sathish for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.