- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 February 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 3463/2026
Judgment
Order This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to respondents 2 to 5 to delete/remove the name of the petitioner from the revenue records for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition and consequently, direct respondents 2 to 5 to effect mutation and issue patta for the property in favour of the rightful owners i.e. (i)Thayalnayaki, (ii))Malar @ Malarkodi, (iii) Sundari and (iv)Sasikala, the four daughters of late Rajakumari, based on the Will dated 16.05.2008. Page3 of 6
2.The petitioner claims that erroneously, his name has been included in the revenue records maintained by the respondents for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner seeks for deletion/removal of his name from the revenue records for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition and he also consequently, seeks for a direction to respondents 2 to 5 to effect mutation and issue patta for the property in favour of the rightful owners, based on the Will dated
16.05.2008. The petitioner had given a representation for the aforesaid purpose on 01.12.2025. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed writ petition.
3.Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3.
4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court, after hearing the necessary parties.
5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation. Page4 of 6
6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 01.10.2025 seeking for deletion/removal of his name from the revenue records for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition and consequently, direct respondents 2 to 5 to effect mutation and issue patta for the property in favour of the rightful owners,
(i)Thayalnayaki, (ii))Malar @ Malarkodi, (iii) Sundari and (iv)Sasikala, the four daughters of late Rajakumari, based on the Will dated 16.05.2008, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 06-02-2026 VGA Page5 of 6 To
¶1The District Collector District collectorate, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore
¶2The Revenue Divisional officer RDO office, Chidambaram,
¶3The Revenue Tahsildar Tahsildar office, Chidambaram,
¶4The Firka Surveyor Taluk office Chidambaram,
¶5The Village Administrative officer Kannankudi Revenue Village, Chidambaram Taluk, WPoNo.o3463oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSEoJ. VGA WPoNo.o3463oofo2026 06-02-2026 Page6oofo6
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Duraimanohar ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector District collectorate, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore 2. The Revenue Divisional officer RDO office, Chidambaram, 3. The Revenue Tahsildar Tahsildar office, Chidambaram, 4. The Firka Surveyor Taluk office Chidambaram, Page2 of 6 5. The Village Administrative officer Kannankudi Revenue Village, Chidambaram Taluk, ..Respondent(s) Directing the respondents 2 to 5 to delete / remove the name of the petitioner from the revenue record in respect of the property comprised of R.S. No 279 / 2 measuring 0.29 cents (Nanjah land) situated at Kannankudi Village, Chidambalam Taluk, Cuddalore District consequently directing the Respondents 2 to 5 to effect mutation and issue patta in respect of the said roperty in favour of the rightful owners namely (i) Thayalayaki, ii) Malar alias Malarkodi (iii) Sundari, and (iv) Sasikala, the four daughters of late Rajakumari based on the Will dated 16.05.2008 (Document No. 42/2008 ) and other supporting documents. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Pugazhenthi For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash Govt Advocate for R1 to R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.