VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Mandira Moorthy Narayanan v. The Assistant Commissioner (St),

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 February 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 3134/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan

Judgment

Order Mr.TNC.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 10.02.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 25.11.2024 for the tax period 2020-2021. The impugned order has passed in the absence of the reply to the aforesaid notice in DRC-01 dated

25.11.2024.

¶4It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 29.01.2026.

¶5At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire disputed tax demand has already been recovered from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register. Page3 of 6

¶6On the other hand, the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent submits that they are unable to confirm the same.

¶7Following the consistent view taken by this Court under similar circumstances, the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order on merits, subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8Needless to state, any amount already recovered from the petitioner shall be adjusted towards the 25% pre-deposit, subject to verification by the respondent.

¶9Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 25.11.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

10.02.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 25.11.2024.

¶10In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondents shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the Page4 of 6 above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶11It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶12In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondents are at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶13Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondents shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶14This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 10-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order AV Page5 of 6 To The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Alwarpet Assessment Circle, Integrated Registration and Commercial Taxes Building, Nandanam, 2nd Floor, Room No. 210, Chennai 35 WPoNo.o3134oofo2026 C.SARAVANANoJ. AV WPoNo.o3134oofo2026 and WMPoNos.3524oando3528oofo2026 10-02-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos.3524 and 3528 of 2026 Mandira Moorthy Narayanan Proprietor of M/s.THIRUMAL NARAYANAN AGENCY No. 21, Thiruvalluvar Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018. ..Petitioner Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Alwarpet Assessment Circle, Integrated Registration and Commercial Taxes Building, Nandanam, 2nd Floor, Room No. 210, Chennai – 600 035. ..Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the Respondent in GSTIN33AEFPN7993A1ZG/2020- 21, culminating in the Assessment Order dated 10.02.2025, passed under Section 73 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017, bearing Reference No.ZD3302250909367, along with the consequential Form GST DRC-07 dated 10.02.2025, and to quash all the impugned proceedings as passed contrary to the provisions of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017, and against the principles of natural justice. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Sivasubramanian For Respondent : Mr.TNC.Kaushik, Addl. Govt. Pleader Page2 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.