S.Elanchezhiyan v. The Union Territory of Puducherry Rep by

ORDER The revision challenges the dismissal of the petition filed under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., seeking registration of an FIR on the complaint given by the petitioner.

¶2It is the case of the petitioner that he is in occupation of the disputed premises as a tenant from 11.09.2013; that he and the then landlord had certain disputes and he had filed a suit in O.S.No.2247 of 2018 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Puducherry, and obtained a decree on

09.03.2021; and that on 25.04.2021, certain persons had illegally entered into the premises and committed theft of new tyres kept in the godown situated in the premises, as the petitioner runs a tyre business. Since the respondent police did not register the complaint, the petitioner sought a direction. The said petition was dismissed by the impugned order dated 18.11.2025. Page3 of 6

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the petitioner had filed the application in the year 2021, there was no adjudication till recently; that taking advantage of the same, the respondents, who had in the meanwhile obtained a decree, cannot contend that no offence has been committed; and that the impugned order is therefore liable to be set aside.

¶4The learned Public Prosecutor (Puducherry) for the first respondent would submit that the complaint of the petitioner was earlier enquired into and it was found that the allegations made by the petitioner were false, and that civil suits are pending between the parties and no cognizable offence has been made out.

¶5The learned counsel for the second and third respondents/de facto complainants would submit that they filed a suit in O.S.No.2115 of 2021 for declaration of title and the said suit was decreed by judgment dated 29.07.2025; and that the above judgment confirms that the dispute is purely civil in nature and that the petitioner has made false allegations.

¶6It is seen that though the petitioner had filed a petition under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. in the year 2021, the same was decided only on 18.11.2025. Page4 of 6 Though such delay in disposal of the petition cannot be justified, it is seen that the proposed accused had, in the meanwhile, filed a suit and obtained a decree. The police have also filed a status report before the Trial Court stating that the allegations made by the petitioner are false. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the dispute is predominantly civil in nature and even if the petitioner claims that he has suffered loss, it is open to him to approach the Civil Court for appropriate remedy.

¶7With the above observations, this Criminal Revision Case stands disposed of. 25-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order cda Page5 of 6 To

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Puducherry.

2.The Station House officer, D Nagar Police Station, Puducherry.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoRCoNo.o86oofo2026 SUNDERoMOHANoJ. cda CRLoRCoNo.o86oofo2026 25-02-2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN S.Elanchezhiyan S/o.Shanmugam, No.23, 5th Cross Street, Bharathi Nagar, Lawspet, Puducherry - 605 008. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Union Territory of Puducherry Rep. by The Station House officer, D Nagar Police Station, Puducherry. 2. Vinoth S/o.Mannangatti, No.38, Goubert Pada Salai, Vazhaikulam, Pondicherry. 3. Mannangatti No.38, Goubert Pada Salai, Vazhaikulam, Pondicherry. (R2 and R3/ defacto complainants are suo motu impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 19.01.2026 in Crl.RC.No.86 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 438 and 442 of BNSS, praying to call for the records in Crl.M.P.No.1684 of 2025 on the file of Page2 of 6 the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Puducherry, and set aside the same and allow this revision petition considering the facts and circumstances of the case and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.S.Senthilkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.M.V.Ramachandramurthy Public Prosecutor (Puducherry) For R1 Mr.C.R.Gokulvisvas For R2 and R3