VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Prabhuram v. Ganesan

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 January 2026
Bench
Sunder Mohanauthor
Case no.
CRL RC 127/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Sunder Mohan

Judgment

O R D E R The revision challenges the order dated 29.10.2025 passed in C.M.P. No. 599 of 2025 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sulur, Coimbatore, refusing to direct registration of FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 02.06.2025.

¶2The gist of the petitioner's complaint is that the proposed accused, on 17.05.2025 at about 23.45 hours, had trespassed into the property of the petitioner, assaulted him, pushed his mother and kicked his father. The petitioner's complaint was not taken cognizance by the Police and hence, the petitioner had filed C.M.P. No. 599 of 2025 under Section 175(3) of BNSS seeking registration of FIR.

¶3The learned Magistrate, by the order under challenge, dismissed the said application on the ground that the petitioner had not filed any medical records to prove the alleged assault on him and his parents. The 7\9 learned Magistrate further observed that the mandatory provisions under Section 173(1) and 173(4) of BNSS have not been complied with by the petitioner.

¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶5It is seen from the records that the petitioner has not produced any proof for having lodged the complaint to the jurisdictional Police. The petitioner has also not exhausted his remedy to send the complaint in writing to the Superintendent of Police concerned as provided under Sections 173(1) and 173(4) of BNSS. Therefore, this Court finds no infirmity in the order passed by the learned Magistrate and the revision stands dismissed.

22.01.2026 nv To The Judicial Magistrate, Sulur, Coimbatore District. 8\9 SUNDER MOHAN,J. nv

22.01.2026 9\9

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Mr.R. Prabhuram, S/o. Mr. Rangaramamoorthy, 3/27, Kodangi Thottam, Segudanthali, Karimathampatty, Coimbatore District 641 659. .. Petitioner Vs. 1. Mr. Ganesan, S/o. Mr. Chinnasamy, No.4/104, North Thottam, 2. Mr. Eswaran @ Rangasamy, S/o. Chinnappan, No.610/4, Chettikadu, Karumathampatty Village, 3. Mr. Paulraj, 1\9 S/o. Mr. Rangasamy, No. 153, Nandhakadu, 4. Mr. Prakash, S/o. Mr. Ponnusamy, No.6/69, Vettukadu, 5. Mr. Manohar, S/o. Mr. Ponnusamy, No. 6/69, Vettukadu, 6. Mr. Maheshkumar, S/o. Mr. Kuttiappan, No. 160, Puthukadu, 7. Mr. Senthilkumar, S/o. Mr. Palanisamy, No.4A, Vethilangadu, 2\9 8. Mr. Jothiraj, S/o. Mr. Marappa Gounder, No. 49, East Thottam, 9. Mr.M. Senthilkumar, S/o. Mr.Muthusamy, No. 8, Kodangi Thottam, 10. Mr. Thennarasu, S/o. Mr. Ramasamy, No. 113, Thennamara Thottam, 11. Mr. Jeyaprakash, S/o.Mr. Kuttiappan, No. 160, Puthukadu, 12. Mr. Parthiban, 3\9 S/o. Mr. Annathurai, No. 540/2B, Poolakadu, 13. Mr. Sivanesan, S/o. Mr. Theivasigamani, No. 45, Poolakadu, 14. Mr. Soundararaj, S/o. Mr. Palanisamy, No. 24, Kodangi Thottam, 15. Mr. Balasubramani, S/o. Mr. Palanisamy, No. 24, Kodangi Thottam, 16. Mr. Ravichandran, S/o. Mr. Chinnasamy, Vadakala Thottam, 4\9 17. Mr. Ravi @ Gurusamy, S/o. Mr. Sivasamy Gounder, Puthugodown, 18. Mr. Sekar, S/o. Mr. Kandhasamy, Vethilangadu, 19. Mr. Vadivelsamy, S/o. Mr. Venkatachala Chettiyar, 20. Mr. Sivakumar, S/o. Mr. Rayappa Gounder, No. 106-B, Thurathikadu, 21. Mr. Rajaram, S/o. Mr. Padmanabhan, 5\9 Cheran Residency, Karumathampatty Village, 22. Mr. Thangavel, S/o. Mr. Palanisamy, No. 106B, Thurathikadu, 23. Mr. Theivasigamani, S/o. Mr.Lakshmana Gounder, No. 159, Poolakadu, 24. Mr. Ponnusamy, S/o. Mr. Chennimalai, No. 6/69, Vettukadu, ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of BNSS to set aside the order of dismissal dated 29.10.2025 made in C.M.P. No. 599 of 2025 on the file of Judicial Magistrate Court at Sulur, 6\9 Coimbatore District. For Petitioner :: Mr. Deepan Uday

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.