VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Prabhu @ Prabhaharan v. The Assistant Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 January 2026
Bench
A.D.Jagadish Chandiraauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 1572/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Spl.S.C.No.43 of 2025 pending on the file of the Special Court for trial of Cases under SC/ST (PoA) Act, Namakkal.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 16.05.2025 at about 09.00 p.m., due to a long-standing dispute, A1 picked up a quarrel with the de facto complainant over parking of a vehicle, abused him in a filthy language, intentionally insulted him by calling him by his caste name, threatened him, and assaulted him, causing him to fall down. When the sister of the de facto complainant intervened, she was also pushed down. A2 and A3 aided A1 in the occurrence. The de facto complainant was, thereafter, taken to the Government Hospital, Namakkal, for treatment. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that L.W.3, who is cited as an eye-witness, has not spoken about the involvement of Page2 of 6 the petitioners. On the contrary, L.W.5 and L.W.6 who are also eye-witnesses, have stated that the petitioners merely intervened to pacify the dispute between A1 and the de facto complainant and that they have not committed any offence, as alleged.

¶4Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submitted that the petitioners, along with the main accused, have abused and assaulted the de facto complainant. He further submitted that there are eye witnesses who have spoken about the involvement of the petitioners and the same is a matter to be decided during trial and cannot be gone into at this stage. He also submitted that sufficient materials are available on record and that the trial Court has already framed charges against the petitioners.

¶5At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought the indulgence of this Court to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners before the trial court. Page3 of 6

¶6Taking note of the facts of the case and the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the trial has already commenced, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the trial proceedings at this stage.

¶7Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. However, acceding to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the presence of the petitioners before the trial court is dispensed with, except for receipt of copies, answering the charges, questioning under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. The petitioners shall be duly represented by their counsel before the trial court on all hearing dates. As far as the stay petition in Crl.MP.No.987 of 2026 is concerned, the same stands closed. Crl.MP.No.988 of 2026 which is filed for dispensing with personal appearance is ordered in the above terms. 29-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VKR Page4 of 6 To

¶1The Special Court for Trial of Cases under SC/ST

(PoA) Act, Namakkal

¶2The Assistant Superintendent of Police Namakkal Police Station, Namakkal. Crime No.251 of 2025.

¶3The Inspector Of Police Namakkal Police Station, Namakkal.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page5 of 6

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. VKR and Crl.M.P. Nos.987 & 988 of 2026 29-01-2026 Page6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P. Nos.987 & 988 of 2026 1. Prabhu @ Prabhaharan 2. Balu @ Balasubramani ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Assistant Superintendent of Police Namakkal Police Station, Namakkal. Crime No.251 of 2025. 2. The Inspector Of Police Namakkal Police Station, Namakkal. 3. M.Ravi ..Respondent(s) Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the records relating to the Criminal Case in Spl.SC.No.43 of 2025 on the file of Special Court for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (PoA) Act, Namakkal and quash the same. Page1 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Ms.Neelavathi P For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Santhosh, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1&R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.