VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

V.Revathi v. P.K.Swamynathan

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 February 2026
Bench
Sunder Mohanauthor
Case no.
CRL RC 113/2026

Judgment

O R D E R This Criminal Revision challenges the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Gobichettipalayam, dismissing the petitioner's complaint Page1 of 4 under Section 138 of N.I. Act for non-payment of process fee for execution of the non-bailable warrant as against the respondent. The petitioner is the complainant and a non-bailable warrant was issued as against the respondent since he did not appear on summons. The petitioner was granted one week time on 03.07.2025 to pay the process fee. Since he had failed to pay the process fee, the complaint was dismissed vide the impugned order.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had not complied with the conditional order and prays that he may be given an opportunity to establish his case on merits, as his non-payment is neither wilful nor wanton.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondent and perused the entire materials available on record.

4.It is seen that the complaint has been dismissed only for the reason that the petitioner had not paid the process fee within one week from 03.07.2025. This Court is of the view that the learned Judicial Magistrate ought to have given one more opportunity to the petitioner as an endeavour should normally be made to adjudicate the dispute between the parties on merits, unless the conduct of any party is in gross violation of the procedure which cannot be countenanced in any manner. Considering the fact of this case, this Court is Page2 of 4 inclined to set aside the impugned order dated 20.11.2025 passed in STC.No.1378 of 2023 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Gobichettipalayam and restore S.T.C.No.1378 of 2023 to file. The petitioner shall pay the process fees if necessary as it is seen that the respondent has entered appearance through a counsel before this Court. The parties are directed to appear in person before the Trial Court (Judicial Magistrate No.II, Gobichettipalayam) on 09th March, 2026 and the learned Judicial Magistrate may thereafter proceed with the case in accordance with law.

5.In the result, this Criminal Revision is allowed. 19-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA To The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Gobichettipalayam. Page3 of 4 CRLoRCoNo.o113oofo2026 SUNDERoMOHAN,oJ. GSA CRLoRCoNo.o113oofo2026 19-02-2026 Page4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN V.Revathi W/o Moorthy, No.8, Irugalur Post, Vemandampalayam, Erode. ..Petitioner(s) Vs P.K.Swamynathan S/o Kumaraswamy Nadar, 5A, Pannimadai Palayam, Kosanam Post, Nmabiyur Taluk, Erode. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Criminal Revision is filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C./under Section 438 read with 422 of BNSS Act, to set aside the order passed in STC.No.1378 of 2023 dated 20.11.2025 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Gobichettipalayam and restore STC.No.1378 of 2023 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Gobichettyplayam for fresh disposal. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Muruganantham For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Veerasekharan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.