VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M/S.Aishwarya Timbers v. Vesthon Exports

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 January 2026
Bench
A.D.Jagadish Chandiraauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 1841/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow A.D.Jagadish Chandira

Judgment

ORDER The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the condition imposed by the learned III Additional Sessions Court at Chennai that the petitioner shall deposit 15% of the cheque amount (i.e Rs.14,00,000/-) to the credit of STC.No.10605 of 2023 on the file of the trial Court within sixty days from the date of that order in Crl.MP.No.11332 of 2025 in C.A.No.1386 of 2025 dated 24.11.2025 against STC.No.10605 of 2025.

¶2The brief facts of the case are as follows :-

2.1. The complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed by the respondent against the petitioner before the learned XXVI Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, in STC.No.10605 of 2023.

2.2. On 24.10.2025, the trial Court found the petitioners/accused guilty, convicted the second petitioner and sentenced him to undergo one year simple imprisonment and further directed him to pay the cheque amount of Rs.14,00,000/- as compensation, in default to undergo thirty days simple imprisonment. Page3 of 6

2.3. Against the said judgment, the petitioner preferred an appeal in Crl.A.No.1386 of 2025 along with a petition in Crl.M.P.No.11332 of 2025 seeking suspension of sentence. On 24.11.2025, the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, while suspending the sentence imposed on the second petitioner, directed him to deposit 15 % of the compensation amount before the trial Court within sixty days from the date of the said order. Aggrieved by the same, the present petition has been filed.

¶3Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that due to financial constraints, the petitioners are unable to mobilize the amount. He further submitted that the petitioners have a good and meritorious case in appeal. Therefore, he prayed that the order directing the petitioners to deposit 15% of the compensation amount may be set aside.

¶4Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the materials available on record, this Court is of the view that the appellate Court, while holding that the petitioners/appellants have made out arguable points in the main appeal, has suspended the sentence imposed on the second petitioner and imposed certain conditions. However, taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there are arguable grounds in the appeal and that Page4 of 6 they have a good case on merits, this Court is inclined to modify the condition imposed by the appellate Court in Crl.M.P.No.11332 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.1386 of 2025 dated 24.11.2025. Accordingly, the direction to deposit 15 % of the compensation amount is hereby modified as 7.5 %. It is also made clear that all other conditions remain unaltered.

¶5At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners prayed that some reasonable time may be granted to the petitioners to comply with the said condition.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to deposit 7.5 % of the compensation amount before the trial Court within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 30-01-2026 MRN Page5 of 6 To

¶1The III Additional Sessions Court at Chennai.

¶2The XXVI Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. Page6 of 6

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. MRN 30-01-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA 1. M/s.Aishwarya Timbers, Proprietor R.L.V.Ashok Kumar, 2. R.L.V.Ashok Kumar ..Petitioners Vs M/s.Vesthon Exports, represented by its Manager and Power of Attorney, Mr.Jaishankar. ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to set aside the condition imposed by the learned III Additional Sessions Court at Chennai that the petitioner shall deposit 15 % of the cheque amount (i.e Rs.14,00,000/-) to the credit of STC.No.10605 of 2023 on the file of the trial Court within sixty days from the date of that order in Crl.MP.No.11332 of 2025 in C.A.No.1386 of 2025 dated 24.11.2025 against STC.No.10605 of 2025. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rajavelu Page2 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.