Tvl.Iks Marketing v. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1

ORDER In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 14.11.2025, passed for the tax period 2021-2022 by the respondent, whereby, the demand proposed in Show Cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 09.09.2025 has been confirmed against the petitioner as the petitioner failed to file a reply to the said Show Cause Notice.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be given one opportunity to file a reply and defend the case that the case may be remitted back to the respondents for fresh adjudication.

¶3At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 10% of the disputed tax confirmed by the impugned order as a condition for de-novo adjudication.

¶4It is noticed that the present Writ Petition has been filed on

12.01.2026 within a period of limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order.

¶5Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 10% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.

¶6Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the impugned order is quashed and the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 09.09.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

14.11.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 09.09.2025.

¶8Any amount which has already recovered from the petitioner or paid by the petitioner against the tax liability confirmed by the impugned order shall be set off and adjusted towards the pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed tax as ordered above. This will be however subject to verification by the respondent.

¶9In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶10It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶11In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶12Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶13This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

22.01.2026 ssn To: The Deputy State Tax Officer-1, Anuppaarpalayam Assessment Circle, Tiruppur. C.SARAVANAN, J., ssn and W.M.P.Nos.2232 and 2233 of 2026

22.01.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.01.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.2232 and 2233 of 2026 Tvl.IKS Marketing, Rep.by its Partner K.Vasanthapriya, No.501/307, Ground Floor, Step 3 Plaza, Avinashi Road, Opp Saravanabhavan Hotel, Tiruppur-641 602. ... Petitioner Vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1, Anuppaarpalayam Assessment Circle, Tiruppur. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent vide his order in GSTIN:33AAGFI9697F1ZY/2021-22 dated 14.11.2025 and quash the same as it is illegal, without jurisdiction and in gross violation of Principles of Natural Justice. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.C.Harsharaj Special Government Pleader