The Union of India, v. M.K. Khader Ali,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.12.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN in W.P.Nos.1342, 1343, 1344, 2077 & 2087 of 2001 and M.P.Nos.1,1,1 & 1 of 2006 Rev.A.No.64 of 2006 The Union of India, Telecom,

... Petitioner

¶1M.K.Khader Ali.

¶2K.L.Suresh

¶3G.Krishnamurthy

¶4K.Suryanarayanan

¶5K.Sekar

¶6R.Chinnathambi

¶7The Registrar,

24.07.2006 in W.P.No.1342 of 2001 For Petitioner

: No appearance for R1 to R6

R7-Tribunal – CAT Rev.A.No.65 of 2006

¶1The Union of India, Telecommunications, Tamilnadu Circle,

¶2Senior Superintendent, Telegraphic Traffic (Admn) CTO, madras

¶3Sub Divisional Engineer, Central Telegraphic Office, Tiruchirappalli.

¶4Sub Divisional Engineer, Telegraphy, Telegraph Office, Tuticorin. ... Petitioners

¶1P.Asha

¶2P.Gurusamy Pandi

¶3M.Murugesan

¶4V.Mathiazhagan

¶5G.Ilangovan

¶6K.Natarajan

¶7P.Kadarkaraiyandi

¶8T.Anthonimuthu

¶9The Registrar,

24.07.2006 in W.P.No.1343 of 2001 For Petitioners

: No appearance for R1 to R8

R9-Tribunal – CAT Rev.A.No.66 of 2006 The Union of India, Telecom,Chennai – 600 002.

... Petitioner

¶1M.Muthukumar

¶2M.Radhakrishnan

¶3P.Veerasamy

¶4K.Samayavel

¶5S.Sivakumar

¶6Manivannan

¶7K.Chellakannu

¶8K.Umamaheswari

¶9The Registrar,

24.07.2006 in W.P.No.1344 of 2001 For Petitioner

: No appearance for R1 to R8

R7-Tribunal – CAT Rev.A.No.67 of 2006

¶1The Union of India, Telecommunications, Tamilnadu Circle,

¶2Chief Superintendent, Telegraphic Traffic (Admn) CTO, madras

¶3The General Manager, Telecommunications, Tanjore – 613 001 ... Petitioners

¶1E.S.Seshadri

¶2s.Anantaraman

¶3I.Krishnakumar

¶4P.Boopal

¶5V.Srinivasan

¶6G.Kannan

¶7S.Krishnan

¶8S.Sivasankaran

¶9The Registrar,

24.07.2006 in W.P.No.2077 of 2001 For Petitioners

: No appearance for R1 to R8

R9-Tribunal – CAT Rev.A.No.68 of 2006 The Union of India, Telecommunications, Tamilnadu Circle, ... Petitioner

¶1C.K.Govindarajan

¶2A.Basheer Ahmed

¶3Muruganandam

¶4R.Ravimarimuthu

¶5M.Chelladurai

¶6K.Palanisamy

¶7T.Natarajan

¶8M.Paul

¶9J.Ramachandran

¶10R.Shanmugam

¶11B.Thangavelu

¶12C.N.Tamaraiselvi

¶13M.S.Veeraraghavan

¶14The Registrar,

24.07.2006 in W.P.No.2087 of 2001 For Petitioner

: No appearance for R1 to R13

R14-Tribunal – CAT COMMON ORDER S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. The Review Petitions have been instituted to review the common order dated 24.07.2006 passed in W.P.Nos.1342 to 1344, 2077 & 2087 of 2001 respectively.

¶2Perusal of the grounds raised in the review petitions would show that the learned Standing Counsel for the review petitioners had not appeared at the time of hearing of the writ petitions by the Division Bench of this Court. Since both the parties had not appeared, the Division Bench considered the issues on merits and passed a common order, following the orders passed in similar W.P.No.15509 of 1998 filed by the Union of India.

¶3The grounds raised in the review petitions relating to the merits cannot be re-adjudicated by expanding the scope of review jurisdiction. This Court does not find any error apparent warranting interference and thus. the Review Petitions stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.)

11.12.2025 vsi Index : Yes Speaking order : Yes To The Registrar, Rev.A.(W).Nos.64otoo68oofo2006 S.M.eSUBRAMANIAM,eJ. and C.KUMARAPPAN,J. vsi Rev.A.(W).Nos.64etoe68eofe2006

11.12.2025 Pageo8oofo8