K.Selvalakshmi v. The State of Tamilnadu Through the Sub-Inspector of Police,

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking expeditious disposal of S.C.No.4 of 2020 pending on the file of the Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Erode, within a stipulated time.

¶2Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is the sole accused. The de facto complainant has given a false complaint against the petitioner, based on which, the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.245 of 2017 for the offence under Section 305 of IPC. He further submitted that after completion of investigation, the final report was filed and the same was taken on the file of the Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Erode, in S.C.No.4 of 2020. He also submitted that the petitioner is aged about 59 years and is suffering from health issues. Therefore, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prayed for the indulgence of this Court to direct early disposal of the case.

¶3Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that there are totally 39 witnesses in this case, out of which, 2 witnesses passed away and that the case now stands posted to

04.02.2026 for commencement of trial. Page3 of 5

¶4Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶5It is pertinent to state that a Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2024) 6 SCC 267, has held that the constitutional courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other court. The relevant portion of the said decision for the sake of ready reference is reproduced below: "47.3. Constitutional courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other courts. Constitutional courts may issue directions for the time-bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the courts concerned where the cases are pending." (emphasis supplied by this Court).

¶6It has also been held in the aforesaid extracted portion that in exceptional circumstances, constitutional courts may issue directions for time bound disposal of cases. Page4 of 5

¶7Taking into consideration the fact that the FIR was registered in the year 2017, and Sessions case is of the year 2020, this Court directs the Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Erode, to dispose of the case in S.C.No.4 of 2020, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the next date of hearing i.e., on 04.02.2026.

¶8With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 27-01-2026 MRN To

¶1The Sub-Inspector of Police, Arachalur Police Station, Erode District. (Crime No.245 of 2017 - registered by Arachalur Police Station, Erode District)

¶2The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

¶3The Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Erode. Page5 of 5

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. MRN 27-01-2026

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA K.Selvalakshmi ..Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu through the Sub-Inspector of Police, Arachalur Police Station, Erode District. (Crime No.245 of 2017 - registered by Arachalur Police Station, Erode District) ..Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to direct the Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Erode to dispose of the case in S.C.No.4 of 2020 within the time frame as stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Deepan Uday For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) Page2 of 5