- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 March 2026
- Bench
- R.Sakthivel
- Case no.
- SA 1626/2003
Judgment
JUDGMENT Ms.Amirtha, representing Mr.R.Subramaniyan, learned Standing Counsel (ACGSC) for Respondent Nos.3 and 4, is before this Court. No representation for the appellant.
¶2On March 2, 2026, this Court has passed the following order: " Mr.P.Sreenivasulu, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr.R.Subramanian, learned Standing Counsel (ACGSC) for the Respondents are before this Court.
¶2Mr.P.Sreenivasulu, learned Counsel for the appellant submits that he has handed over the bundle and Change of Vakalat to the appellant. To that effect, the learned Counsel has filed a Memo dated 02.03.2026 before this Court and the Memo is recorded.
¶3Registry is directed to print the name of the appellant in the Page3 of 4 next listing day.
¶4List the matter on 09.03.2026."
¶2Today the sole appellant's name – Mr.N.Krishnamurthi, has been printed in the cause list. The appellant was called absent.
¶3Despite the appellant's name is printed in the cause list, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Second Appeal for non-prosecution.
¶4Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 11-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order BKN To:
¶1The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court – IV, Chennai
¶2The XVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court at Madras. Page4 of 4
R.SAKTHIVEL, J. BKN 11-03-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL and C.M.P.No.14890 of 2003 Mr.N.Krishnamurthi, No.5, Meeran Sahib Street, Mount Road, Chennai – 2. ..Appellant/1st Respondent / Plaintiff Vs. 1. Mr.R.V.Mani, O.K.Films, No.829, Airlines Building, Mount Road, Chennai – 2. ... 1st Respondent/Appellant / 2nd Defendant 2. M/s.P.A.Art Productions, Rep.By Its Power Of Attorney Agent Mr.Panchu Arunachalam No.3-C, North Boag Road Chennai – 17. ... 2nd Respondent/ 2nd Respondent / 1st Defendant 3. The Station Director, Doordharshan Kendra Of Madras Chepauk, Chennai – 5. ... 3rd Respondent/ 3rd Respondent / 3rd Defendant 4. Controller Of Programmes Regional Language Satellite Services, Office Of The Director Of Doordharshan Kendra, No.4, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi – 1. ... 4th Respondent/ 4th Respondent / 4th Defendant Page2 of 4 Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated June 30, 2003 made in A.S.No.97 of 2002 by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court – IV, Chennai – 1, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated November 27, 2001 in O.S.No.3550 of 1994 by the learned XVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court at Madras. For Appellant(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirtha for Mr.R.Subramaniyan (ACGSC) For Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.