- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 June 2026
- Bench
- R.Sakthivel
- Case no.
- SA 669/2007
Judgment
JUDGMENT This Second Appeal has been filed praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated March 26, 2007 made in A.S.No.40 of 2006 on the file of Principal Sub Judge, Tiruvannamalai, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated February, 20, 2006 made in O.S.No. 73 of 2005 on the file of District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai.
¶2The daily orders dated February 19, 2025; March 27, 2026 and April 20, 2026 this Court observed as follows:- February 19, 2025 Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel for appellants and respondents appeared. The learned counsel for appellants reported that sole appellant and 1st respondent died and she had filed petitions for impleading legal heirs of 1st respondent. Hence, she seeks time.
¶2Post the matter on 10.03.2025 along with the petitions in CMP.SR.Nos.27080 to 27085 of 2024. March 27, 2026 Ms.R.Anvitha , representing Mrs.V.Srimathi, Counsel on record for the Appellant is before this Court.
¶2She submits that the sole appellant as well as the first respondent died. In this regard, she filed necessary applications and the same are under scrutiny in the Registry. Hence, she seeks three weeks time. Request acceded to.
¶3List the matter on April 20, 2026. Page3 of 4 April 20, 2026 Mr.Kalai Selvan, representing Mrs.V.Srimathi, learned counsel on record for the appellant submits that an application has been filed to bring on record the legal heir(s)/legal representative(s) of the sole appellant, and the same is under scrutiny before the Registry. Hence, he seeks two weeks' time to follow up with the matter. His request is acceded to. Post this matter on 02.06.2026.
¶3Despite sufficient opportunity is given, the Appellant did not file proper application to bring on record the legal heir(s)/legal representative(s) of the sole appellant. Hence, this Second Appeal shall stand dismissed as abated. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. 02-06-2026 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No kkd To
¶1The Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruvannamalai.
¶2The Principal Subordinate Court, Tiruvannamalai. Page4 of 4
R.SAKTHIVEL, J. KKD 02-06-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL and M.P.No.1 of 2007 A.Elumalai S/o Adhimoola Gounder Varpakkam Village & Post Tiruvannamalai Taluk. .. Appellant/Respondent/ Plaintiff Vs. 1. K.Sahadevan S/o Kannu Gounder 2. S.Valli W/o Sahadevan Kilakku Udukka Puravadai , Arpakkam Village & Post, Tiruvannamalai Taluk. ..Respondents/Appellants/ Defendants Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated March 26, 2007, made in A.S.No.40 of 2006 on the file of Principal Sub Judge, Tiruvannamalai, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated February, 20, 2006 made in O.S.No.73 of 2005 on the file of District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai. For Appellant(s) : Ms.M.Saranya for Ms.V.Srimathi For Respondent(s) : Mr.K.S.Vishal for M/s.Sarvbhauman Associates N.Jaikumar - R2 Page2 of 4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.