VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M/S.Sheenlac Paints Ltd v. The Assessment Unit

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 February 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 1799/2023

Judgment

ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 28.12.2022 passed under Sections 143(3) read with 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which has emanated from the show cause notice dated

26.12.2022.

¶2The show cause notice was digitally signed at about 6.08 p.m. on

27.12.2022 and served on the petitioner whereby the petitioner was asked to respond by 28.12.2022. Thus, in effect, the petitioner was afforded only about 13 hours' time to submit a response.

¶3The respondent proceeded to pass the impugned order dated

28.12.2022 even before the petitioner could submit his reply to the said notice. The assessment was completed to avoid lapsing of the assessment on account of the limitation under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, it was to expire on 31.12.2022.

¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record.

¶5It is noticed that the petitioner was issued with a notice under Section 142(1) dated 23.09.2022. Subsequently, a Show Cause Notice dated 01.12.2022 was issued, to which the petitioner submitted a reply on 06.12.2022. Thereafter, a second Show Cause Notice was issued on 26.12.2022, which ultimately culminated in the impugned order dated 28.12.2022.

¶6Having considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent and having perused the materials available on record after it is evident that there has been a manifest violation of the principles of natural justice, as the impugned order has been passed with undue haste pursuant to the show cause notice, to avoid abatement of assessment proceedings in view of the limitation under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside and is accordingly set aside.

¶7Therefore, the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order on merits. The petitioner shall submit his reply to the said show cause notice within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the same, the respondent shall consider it and pass appropriate orders in lieu of the impugned order in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

¶8With the above directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

16.02.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order av To

¶1The Assessment Unit Income Tax Department National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi – 110 003.

¶2The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 3, Chennai, Income Tax Department, No.121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034.

C.SARAVANAN, J. av and W.M.P.Nos.1914 to 1916 of 2023

16.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.02.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.1914 to 1916 of 2023 M/s Sheenlac Paints Limited Represented by Managing Director No.76-A, 1GKS Estates, Ambattur Industrial Estate, 11th Cross Street, Chennai – 600 098. PAN: AASCS5073J ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Assessment Unit Income Tax Department National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi – 110 003. 2. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 3, Chennai, Income Tax Department, No.121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the Writ Petitioner on the file of the first Respondent to quash the impugned order dated 28.12.2022 passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Act for the Assessment Year 2021-2022 in DIN:ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2022-23/1048296762(1). For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Sriraman For Respondents : Ms.C.P.Priya, Senior Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.