VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

A.Sangeetha v. The Inspector General of Prisons

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 March 2025
Bench
M.S. Rameshauthor, N.Senthilkumar
Case no.
WP 1880/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.S. RameshFollow N.Senthilkumar

Judgment

ORDER

M.S.RAMESH, J. and

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. This writ petition has been filed to call for the records No.548126 / Tha Ku2/ 2024 dated 9.12.2024 passed by respondent No.2, and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to grand 28 days ordinary leave to the petitioner's husband Alagiri, S/o.Perumal, aged 40 years, Convict Prisoner no.10122 (PID 105088), now confined in the central Prison-1, Puzhal, Chennai-66.

¶2Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the documents.

¶3The petitioner herein seeks for grant of 28 days of ordinary leave for her husband, without escort, on the ground that the convict prisoner's father has certain medical ailments and she requires the presence of her husband for arranging funds for the treatment and for arranging funds to meet the educational expenses of their children. Further, the detenue has undergone 6 years and 25 days of imprisonment.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor produced a copy of the Probation Officer's report dated 02.01.2025, in which, the Probation Officer has not recommended for grant of leave as the reasons assigned by the petitioner is said to be untrue.

¶5Although the Probation Officer has not recommended for grant of leave, considering the medical requirement of the prisoner's father, we are inclined to grant leave, with minimum escort for a period of 21 days in exercise of our powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

¶6Accordingly, the detenue viz., Alagiri, S/o.Perumal, aged 40 years, Convict Prisoner no.10122 (PID 105088), is hereby granted leave for a period of 21 days, with minimum escort, commencing from 10.00 am on 11.03.2025 to 5 pm of 31.03.2025. On expiry of the ordinary leave, the detenu shall surrender before the prison authorities. The second respondent is directed to provide minimum escort of two police constables to the convict from the Central Prison from the time he leaves the prison and till such time he is taken back to the prison.

¶7Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [M.S.R., J] [N.S., J]

03.03.2025 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet: Yes/No Anu Note: Issue Order Copy on 10.03.2025 Upload the order copy forthwith To

¶1The Inspector General Of Prisons Chennai Range, Prison Head Quarters, Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

2.The Superintendent Of Prison Central Prison-1, Puzhal, Chennai-66.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. W.P.No.1880oofo2025 M.S.RAMESH,oJ. and N.SENTHILKUMAR,oJ. Anu W.P.No.1880oofo2025 andoW.M.P.No.2153oofo2025

03.03.2025 Pageo6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.03.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and W.M.P.No.2153 of 2025 A.Sangeetha ...Petitioner/ wife of the detenue Vs. 1. The Inspector General Of Prisons Chennai Range, Prison Head Quarters, Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai- 600 008. 2.The Superintendent Of Prison Central Prison-1, Puzhal, Chennai- 66. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records No 548126 / Tha Ku2/ 2024 dated 9.12.2024 passed by respondent No.2, and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to grand 28 days ordinary leave to the petitioner's husband Alagiri, S/o.Perumal, aged 40 years, Convict Prisoner no.10122 (PID 105088), now confined in the central Prison- 1, Puzhal, Chennai- 66. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondent : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.