VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Tvl.Sri Shanmuga Traders v. Assistant Commissioner (St / Review)

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 February 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 2076/2025

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P. Nos. 2433, 2436, 2446 and 2448 of 2025 W.P. No.2076 of 2025: Tvl.Sri Shanmuga Traders, Rep. By its Proprietor Mr.Pechimuthu Perumal, No.3/396a, Venrasi Amman Koil Street, Karapakkam, Chennai 600097. ..Petitioner(s) Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST / Review) O/o.Deputy Commissioner (ST), South III 7th Floor, Integrated Registration and Commercial Taxes Department Building, South Tower, Nandanam, Chennai 35. ..Respondent(s) W.P. No.2083 of 2025: Tvl.Sri Shanmuga Traders, Rep. By its Proprietor Mr.Pechimuthu Perumal, No.3/396a, Venrasi Amman Koil Street, Karapakkam, Chennai 600097. ..Petitioner(s) Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST / Review) O/o.Deputy Commissioner (ST), South III 7th Floor, Integrated Registration and Commercial Taxes Department Building, South Tower, Nandanam, Chennai 35. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER in W.P.No.2076 of 2025: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned ITC Blocking Order dated

23.12.2024 in bearing GSTIN. No.33ARTPP0824B1ZZ issued by the Respondent and quash the same as illegal and ultra vires and consequently direct the respondent raise the attachment of Blocking the ITC over the petitioner Electronic Credit Ledge to the tune of Rs.5,01,084/- SGST and Rs. 5,01,084/- CGST. PRAYER in W.P.No.2083 of 2025: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned ITC Blocking Order dated

23.12.2024 in bearing GSTIN. No.33ARTPP0824B1ZZ issued by the Respondent and quash the same as illegal and ultra vires and consequently direct the respondent raise the attachment of Blocking the ITC over the petitioner Electronic Credit Ledge to the tune of Rs.3,14,824/- SGST and Rs.3,14,824/- CGST. For Petitioner(s): in both cases Mr.Abdul Rahman For Respondent(s): in both cases Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Advocate COMMON ORDER By this common order these petitions are being disposed of.

¶2In these writ petitions, the petitioner is challenging the blocking of petitioner's electronic credit ledger on 23.12.2024 under Rule 86A of the respective GST Rules. As per sub-rule (3) to Rule 86A, the restriction will cease to have effect after a period of one year. These impugned orders have a limited shelf life and they would be ceased to have operation. and therefore the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous. However, there shall be a direction to the respondent to ensure that blocking of the electronic credit ledger is removed from the web portal.

¶3These writ petitions stand closed with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 12-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order MKA To: The Assistant Commissioner (ST / Review) O/o.Deputy Commissioner (ST), South III 7th Floor, Integrated Registration and Commercial Taxes Department Building, South Tower, Nandanam, Chennai 35. C. SARAVANAN J. MKA 12-02-2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.