VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Sathiamurthy v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 February 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 4931/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had submitted an online application on 12.11.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3.Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. Mr.R.Venkatatesa Perumal, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice on behalf of the third respondent.

4.No prejudice will be caused to respondents 1 and 2 if the said authorities are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from the neighbouring land owners and any other party as they deem it fit. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, respondents 1 and 2 are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners and also to any other party, whom they deem it fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the second respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the first respondent, the third respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 18-02-2026 vga To

1.The Tahsildar Tirukkoilur Taluk, Kallakurichi District.

2.The Surveyor Tirukkoilur Taluk, Kallakurichi District.

3.The Inspector of Police Tirukkoilur Taluk, Kallakurichi District. ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. vga

18-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Sathiamurthy Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Tirukkoilur Taluk, Kallakurichi District. 2.The Surveyor Tirukkoilur Taluk, Kallakurichi District. 3.The Inspector of Police Tirukkoilur Taluk, Kallakurichi District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to survey and fix the boundary stones of the Petitioners land situated in Kallakurichi District, Tirukkoilur Taluk, Panapadi Village, Lands in Survey No.152/2A1 , in this an extent of 0.04.0 Ares, Survey No.152/ 2A2, in this extent of 1.33.0 Ares, Survey No.152/5 in this extent of 1.44.00 Ares, situated at Panapadi Village Village Limit based on petitioner application for the survey and fix the boundaries vide Challan No.2025/ 0123/ 33/ 009779 dated 12.11.2025 and give proper police Protection to enable the 2nd respondent to measure the land. For Petitioner(s): MrR.Ajay Richardson For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt Advocate For R1 and R2 Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Govt Advocate(Crl.Side) For R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.