VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Venkatachalam v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 February 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 3068/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application, dated 13.11.2025, with the assistance of the respondents 3 and 4, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on

13.11.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been Page No.2 of 6 considered by the official respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 3 and 4. Since no adverse order has been passed against the respondents 5 to 8 in this writ petition, notice to the respondents 5 to 8 is dispensed with by this Court.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to any of the respondents, if the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the respondents 5 to 8, the neighbouring land owners and any other party as they deem fit within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to issue notice to the respondents 5 to 8, the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice. Page No.3 of 6

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 1 and 2 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, with the assistance of the respondents 3 and 4, if required, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) There shall be no order as to costs.

03.02.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp Page No.4 of 6 To

1.The Tahsildar, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.

2.The Taluk Surveyor, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Omallur Police Division, Salem District.

4.The Inspector of Police, Jalagandapuram Police Station, Salem District. Page No.5 of 6 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,

J.

sp

03.02.2026 Page No.6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.02.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Venkatachalam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 2.The Taluk Surveyor, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Omallur Police Division, Salem District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Jalagandapuram Police Station, Salem District. 5.Govindhan 6.Eswaran 7.Alamelu 8.Eswari ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 Page No.1 of 6 and 2, to conduct a survey and demarcate the boundaries by erecting the boundary stones in respect of the land comprised in Survey No.168/3A1A, measuring an extent of 0.35.34 hectares of land, in Patta No.1518, situated at Surapalli Revenue Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District based on the petitioner's online application dated 13.11.2025 vide Application No.2025/0123/08/014245, within a stipulated time with adequate police protection. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prabakaran For Respondents : Mr.S.Arumugam Government Advocate [R1 & R2] Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Government Advocate (Crl.Side) [R3 & R4] Notice dispensed with [R5 to R8] *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.