Munirkhan v. State Rep.By, Inspector of Police,

ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1)(aa), 4(1)(B), 4(1)(h), 4(1)(A), 14(A) of TNP in Crime No.13 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused are involved in transportation of 26 bottles of pondy liquor in a car. Hence, the complaint has been lodged against the petitioners, pursuant to which the present petition has been filed.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are ready to cooperate with the investigation. Therefore, he prayed that anticipatory bail be granted to the petitioners.

¶4The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are no previous cases against them and investigation in this case is pending. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the nature of the allegations, there are no previous cases against them and investigation in this case is pending, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Tindivanam on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute separate bonds for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition that:

(a) If the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.

29.01.2026 Vv To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate-II, Tindivanam

¶2The Inspector of Police, PEW Tindivanam Police Station, Tindivanam, Villupuram District

3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.

K.RAJASEKAR

, J.

Vv

Crl.O.P.No.1378 of 2026

29.01.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.1378 of 2026 1.G.Munirkhan 2. K.Karthik 3. C.Dhayalan 4. A.Senthilkumar 5. R.Sivakumar ... Petitioners Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, PEW Tindivanam Police Station, Tindivanam, Villupuram District ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge this petitioners herein on bail in the event of their at the hands of the respondent police in Cr.No.13 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.Tamilselvan For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)