- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 March 2026
- Bench
- R.Sakthivel
- Case no.
- CMP 1325/2026
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL CMP Nos. 1325, 1330 and 1328 OF 2026 in SA NO. 1049 OF 1992 In all C.M.P's.
¶1K.Veeramuthu Naicker 1st Petitioner / 1st Appellant S/o.Krishnappa Naicker, Chinnasami Naicker(died), Muthuvel (died), Vaiyapuri Udayar (died), Masilamani Ammal (died).
¶2M.Muniammal W/o.Late P.Muthuvel Udayar.
¶3M.Ramalingam S/o.Late P.Muthuvel Udayar
¶4M.Veeramuthu S/o.Late P.Muthuvel Udayar
¶5M.Muthukumar S/o.Late P.Muthuvel Udayar.
¶6M.Muthukumar S/o.Late P.Muthuvel Udayar.
¶7M.Poomathi D/o.Late P.Muthuvel Udayar.
¶8Valarmathi D/o.Late P.Muthuvel Udayar.
¶9V.Pannerselvam S/o.Late P.Vaiyapuril Udayar.
¶10V.Ilaiyakannu S/o.Late P.Vaiyapuri Udayar
¶11Marimuthu S/o.Narayanasamy Udayar
¶12Pachamuthu S/o.Narayanasamy Udayar Petitioners 1 to 12 are residing at Porasakurichi Village, Kallkurichi Taluk, Villupuram District. Petitioners 2 to 12 / Appellants 2 to 17
¶13C.Thamizharasi W/o.Late Chinnaswami Naicker.
¶14C.Dhanalakshmi D/o.Late Chinnaswami Naicker.
¶15C.Sivasankar S/o.Late Chinnaswami Naicker.
¶16C.Sriram S/o.Late Chinnaswami Naicker, Thirukanangur Village, Sankarapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi. Petitioners 13 to 16 / Proposed Appellants 18 to 21
¶17D.Selvi W/o.Late Durairaj.
¶18D.Muthuraman S/o.Late Durairaj.
¶19D.Mutharasi D/o.Late Durairaj, Petitioners 17 to 19 are residing at No.2 Middle Street, Porasakurichi Village, Kallakurichi Taluk, Kallakurichi District. Petitioners 17 to 19 / Proposed Appellants 22 to 24 Vs
¶1Rangaraju Naidu (died)
2.D.Prema W/o.Durairaj.
3.D.Murali S/o.Durairaj, Both are residing at D.No.20, OldNo.130/B1, Kisaval Nagar, Kallakurichi Taluk, Villupuram District Now Resesiding at. Mugabinai Jewelry Pawn Shop "LTR" Building, Kallakurichi Taluk, Kallakurichi District. Respondent(s) / Respondents 1 to 3 CMP No. 1325 of 2026 PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 praying to condone the delay of 1822 days in filing the petitioner to set aside abatment caused due to the death of the 2nd Appellant, namely Chinnaswami Naicker. CMP No. 1330 of 2026 PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order XXII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to bring on record the petitioners 13 to 16 / proposed Appellants 18 to 21 herein as legal representatives of the deceased 2nd Appellant, Namely Chinnaswami Naicker and array them as Appellants 18 to 21 in the above Second Appeal. CMP No. 1328 of 2026 PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order XXII Rule 9(2) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to set aside the abatment caused due to the death of the 2nd Appellant, namely Chinnaswami Naicker. In all C.M.P's. For Petitioner: Mr.Sathish Kumar for Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar For Respondent: Mr.P.Vijay for R2 and R3 COMMON ORDER These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed to condone the delay of 1822 days in setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the second appellant, namely Chinnaswami Naicker, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the second appellant and to bring on record the petitioners 13 to 16 as appellants 18 to 21 as legal representatives of the deceased second appellant, in the above second appeal.
¶2Mr.Sathish Kumar, representing Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned Counsel on record for the petitioners in all the petitions and Mr.P.Vijay, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3, are before this Court.
¶3Heard both sides.
¶4This Court has perused the affidavit filed in support of these petitions.
¶5It is stated that the second appellant namely Chinnaswami Naicker, passed away on August 27, 2020, leaving behind his wife – Thamizharasi, daughter – Dhanalakshmi and sons – Sivasankar and Sriram as his Legal heirs / Legal Representatives.
¶6The reasons stated in the affidavit are satisfactory. Hence, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed. 03-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes bkn Note: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the Second Appeal. CMPeNos.e1325,e1330e&e1328eofe2026 R.SAKTHIVELoJ. bkn CMPoNo.o1325oofo2026, CMPoNO.o1330oOFo2026,o andoCMPoNO.o1328oOFo 2026,oinoSAoNO.o1049oOFo 1992 03-03-2026
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.