VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Manivannan v. Union of India,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 March 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 5534/2020

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated

10.07.2019 pass by the 2nd respondent, rejecting the petitioners' objection to the 3(c) enquiry notice.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the respondent by issuing notification under Section 3(A)(1) were acquired the petitioners' land for the purpose of putting up a toll plaza. Though the petitioners made objection to the same, the same was rejected by the Page3 of 6 respondents vide order dated 10.07.2019. Challenging the same, the present writ petition is filed.

¶3However, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that due to the further development, the prayer in this writ petition has become infructuous. She would submit that the Toll Plaza was set up and it is in operation from 27.05.2022 therefore, she would submit that nothing survives in this case.

¶4Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondents and perused the material available on record.

¶5As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the respondents, in the present case, challenge is with regard to the enquiry but subsequently, order has also been passed and the Toll Plaza has been set up and it is in operation. Under these circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that they have not received order copy.

¶6In such being the case, the respondent concerned is directed to serve copy of the order passed by the respondents within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the order, they are at liberty to to challenge the same in the manner known to law. Page4 of 6

¶7This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 13-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order KKN Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Secretary to Government, Union of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi.

¶2The Competent Authority-cum-Special District Revenue Officer (L.A.), National Highways 227, Tiruchirapalli / Ariyalur, O/o.The Old District Collector Office, 2nd Floor, Trichy.

¶3The Special Tahsildar (L.A.), National Highways 227, Unit 2, Udayarpalayam, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District

¶4The Project Director, The National Highways Authorities of India, Project Implementation Unit - Villupuram, Having Office at Vazhuthureddy Layout, Villupuram. WPoNo.o5534oofo2020 KRISHNANoRAMASAMY,oJ. KKN WPoNo.o5534oofo2020 13-03-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and WMP.No.6472 & 6473 of 2020 1. R.Manivannan 2. R.Kamalakannan Rep. By his Power of Attorney Agent, Mrs.K.Vasantha ..Petitioner(s) Vs. 1. Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi. 2. The Competent Authority-cum- Special District Revenue Officer (L.A.), National Highways 227, Tiruchirapalli / Ariyalur, O/o.The Old District Collector Office, 2nd Floor, Trichy. 3. The Special Tahsildar (L.A.), National Highways 227, Unit 2, Udayarpalayam, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District 4. The National Highways Authorities of India, Rep. by the Project Director, Project Implementation Unit - Villupuram, Having Office at Vazhuthureddy Layout, Villupuram. ..Respondent(s) Page2 of 6 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the concerned records relating to the order in Na. Ka. No. NH1/ 554/ 2018 dated 10.07.2019 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to relocate the Toll Plaza from the petitioners' land in Survey No.116/1A, in Managethi Village, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District to an extent of 0.57.5 hectares to the adjacent Government Poramboke Lands and other benefits. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Gnanasekar For Respondent(s): Mr.G.Karthikeyan Additional Solicitor General for R1 Mr.Su.Srinivasan for R4 Ms.S.Indhu Bala Additional Government Pleader for R2 & R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.