VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Dinesh Kumar v. The Commercial Tax Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 February 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 3200/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan

Judgment

O R D E R In this writ petition, the petitioner who is a legal heir of the deceased assessee, namely V.Kanagarasu, who died on 14.05.2024 has challenged the impugned Assessment order dated 21.01.2025.

¶2The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated

21.01.2025, which was passed pursuant to a show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 25.11.2024. The impugned proceedings were initiated against the deceased assessee, in the absence of any proper intimation to the Department regarding his demise.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire disputed tax was recovered on 31.05.2025 from the Electronic Credit Ledger standing in the name of the deceased assessee, who is the father of the petitioner.

¶4The learned counsel for the respondent is however unable to confirm the same.

¶5The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in possession of all documents to substantiate that the demand proposed in the notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 25.11.2024 is unsustainable and therefore seeks an opportunity for adjudication by way of de novo assessment.

¶6I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent.

¶7Considering the fact that the impugned Assessment order is ex-parte in nature and following the consistent view taken by this Court under similar circumstances, the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash or from the petitioner's Electronic cash Register within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8Needless to state, if any recovery has already been made, as stated to have been made on 31.05.2025 as stated above by the petitioner towards the tax liability confirmed under the impugned order, no further deposit shall be required to be made by the petitioner.

¶9The petitioner shall also file a proper reply to the show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 25.11.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the defence by treating the impugned order as an addendum to the said notice within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶10In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶11It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the deposit of 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner is not in arrears of any amount barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶12In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶13Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶14The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, the connected W.M.Ps. are closed.

06.02.2026 nvi To: The Commercial Tax Officer, Villupuram Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, Collectorate, Master Plan Complex, Villupuram-605 602.

C.SARAVANAN, J. nvi W.P.No.3200 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.3615 and 3616 of 2026

06.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.02.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.3615 and 3616 of 2026 Shri.Dinesh Kumar S/o.Late V.Kanagarasu, 178, P.Main Road, E.B-Poothamedu, Tennamadevi, Villupuram-605 601. ... Petitioner Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Villupuram Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, Collectorate, Master Plan Complex, Villupuram-605 602. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned DRC-07 order dated 21.01.2025 bearing Reference No.ZD330125163983C for the assessment year 2020-2021, passed by the Respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Derrick Sam For Respondent : Mr.TNC Kaushik, Additional Government Pleader ***************

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.