VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.Ramesh v. The Union of India

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 June 2026
Bench
Mohammed Shaffiqauthor
Case no.
WP 2524/2023

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Mohammed Shaffiq

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 18.11.2022, quash the same and consequently forbear the 3rd respondent, their men, agents, servants, subordinates or anyone acting under him from in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the properties comprised in S.Nos.306/2A and 306/2B, situated at No.32, I, Basin Road, Sathankadu Village, Thiruvotriyur, Chennai-600 019.

¶2At the outset, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondents pointed out that petitioner may have to submit their reply to the impugned notice. He would further submit that if any such reply is submitted by petitioner, the same would be considered by the respondents and appropriate orders would be passed in accordance with law, more particularly, keeping in view Sections 4 and 5 of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. Agreed to by the learned counsel for petitioner.

¶3In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed of, the petitioner may Page3 of 4 submit their reply to the impugned notice. If any such reply is submitted by the petitioner, the same shall be considered by the respondents and appropriate orders shall be passed on merits and in accordance with law, keeping in view Sections 4 and 5 of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any views with regard to the merits of the case and it is open to the concerned respondent to consider the case on its own merits and in accordance with law. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 19-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order MKA To:

¶1The Additional Divisional Railway Manager, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi-100 001.

¶2The General Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai-600 003.

¶3The Estate Officer DRM Office, Chennai Division, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. Page4 of 4 MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J. MKA 19-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and WMP Nos.2620 and 2621 of 2023 M.Ramesh S/o.M.Muthumalai (Late), No.78, South Mada Street, Thiruvotriyur, Chennai-600 019. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Union of India, Rep. by Additional Divisional Railway Manager, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi-100 001. 2. The Union of India Owning the Southern Railways, Rep. by its General Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. 3. The Estate Officer, DRM Office, Chennai Division, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the 3rd respondent bearing number M/W 234/Ench-TVT / 3 dated 18.11.2022 and quash the same and consequently forbearing the 3rd respondent, their men, agents, servants, subordinates or anyone acting under him from in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the properties comprised in No. 32, I, Basin Road, S.No. 306/2A and 306/2B, Sathankadu Village, Thiruvotriyur, Chennai-600 019 by the petitioner Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.Ravichandran for Ms.A.M.Amutha Ganesh For Respondent(s): Mr.ARL.Sundaresan Additional Solicitor General of India Assisted by Mr.K.S.Jeyaganeshan Senior Panel Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.