- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 February 2026
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- WP 3018/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan
Judgment
ORDER Mr.C.Harsharaj, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondents.
¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondents.
¶3The Petitioner has challenged the impugned Assessment order dated 18.02.2019 passed under Section 22(4) of TNVAT Act, 2006 for the tax period 2015-2016 by the 2nd Respondent. By the impugned order, the proposals contained in Show Cause Notice dated 06.09.2018 has been confirmed against the Petitioner in absence of a reply from the Petitioner to the aforesaid Notice.
¶4The impugned order records that the Petitioner had surrendered the Registration Certification and the Registration was cancelled with effect from 29.10.2014. However, it has been recorded in the impugned order that the Petitioner has effected a sale for a sum of Rs.77,48,396/- after the cancellation of registration as was evidenced in the web, sales details from the other dealers in Annexure – I. Page3 of 6
¶5The Petitioner was also issued with Notices dated 06.09.2018 and 24.10.2018. However, Notice dated 24.10.2018 was returned with postal endorsement "refused". Thus, invoking Section 22(4) of the respective GST enactments, the impugned Assessment order has been passed.
¶6It is noticed that the Petitioner had approached this Court in W.P.No.49786 of 2025 challenging the proceedings initiated against the Petitioner under the Revenue Recovery Act to attach the personal property of the Petitioner for sale.
¶7By order dated 19.12.2025, this Court disposed the aforesaid writ petition granting liberty to the Petitioner to challenge the impugned Assessment orders, subject to the Petitioner depositing the entire disputed tax confirmed vide Assessment order dated 18.02.2019 for the respective Tax Periods i.e., 2013-2014 and 2015-2016.
¶8It is in this background, the Petitioner has challenged the assessment order dated 18.02.2019 passed for the Tax Period 2015-2016 in this Writ Petition. As such, there is no merits in the challenge to the impugned Assessment order, at this distant point of time, particularly in the light of the observations in the impugned assessment order. Page4 of 6
¶9However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to challenge the assessment orders for the respective tax periods before the Appellate Commissioner subject to the Petitioner complying with the terms of order dated
19.12.2025 of this Court in W.P.No.49786 of 2025 within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶10The Petitioner shall therefore pre-deposit the tax confirmed vide assessment orders both dated 18.02.2019 passed for the respective Tax Periods as was ordered by this Court on 19.12.2025 within the time stipulated therein.
¶11In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the conditions stipulated in the order dated 19.12.2025 in W.P.No.49786 of 2025, the Respondents are at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
¶12This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 11-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Page5 of 6 jas To
¶1The Joint Commissioner of State Tax Government of Tamil Nadu Commercial Taxes Department Hosur (JCT) Krishnagiri District.
¶2The Assistant commissioner (ST) Hosur (South) Hosur, Krishnagiri District. WPoNo.o3018oofo2026 C.SARAVANAN,oJ. jas WPoNo.o3018oofo2026 and W.M.P.Nos.3402oando3404oofo2026 11-02-2026 Page6oofo6
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.3402 and 3404 of 2026 V Manjunath ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Joint Commissioner of State Tax Government of Tamil Nadu, Commercial Taxes Department Hosur (JCT) Krishnagiri District. 2. The Assistant commissioner (ST) Hosur (South), Hosur, Krishnagiri District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the entire records which culminated in issuing the impugned proceeding bearing TIN:33033365296/2015-16 dated 18.02.2019 on the file of the second respondent, quash the same. For Petitioner(s): S.Saishankar For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Harsharaj Special Government Pleader Page2 of 6
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.