VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

The Tamil Nadu Government Schedule Castes v. The Inspector General of Registration

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 April 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 2152/2024

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned Form-VII registered in favour of the third respondent vide proceedings dated

20.03.2023 by the second respondent.

¶2The petitioner is a registered Association and there has been dispute with regard to election for the post of President and State General Secretary. In the year 2017, a dispute arouse between the petitioner Association and the third respondent as the third respondent has proclaimed himself as the State General Secretary of the Association contrary to the bye-law and submitted Form-VII under Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 17 of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Rule, 1978 to the second respondent, for which, objections were raised on behalf of the petitioner Association. Finally, an ex-parte order was passed by the second respondent, by proceedings dated 09.07.2018 and thereafter, an enquiry was conducted and ultimately, the first respondent directed the parties to approach the civil Court vide proceedings dated

03.02.2020. Pursuant to the same, a suit was filed before this Court in C.S.No.889 of 2018 by the third respondent which was later re-numbered as O.S.No.2206 of 2019 on the file of learned XIXth Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. In the said suit, trial was over and arguments are to be advanced. While so, the second respondent registered Form-VII in favour of the third respondent by proceedings dated 20.03.2023, which is impugned in the present writ petition. Challenging the same, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner narrated the aforesaid facts and submitted that the suit in O.S.No.2206 of 2019 has been decreed in favour of the third respondent, against which, an appeal has been filed by the petitioner Association in A.S.No.949 of 2024 before this Court which is pending. Hence, this Court may grant liberty to the petitioner to canvass all the points raised in this writ petition in the pending appeal.

¶4Since the disputed questions of facts are involved and that an appeal is pending before this Court concerning the same issue, this Court cannot go into the merits of the contentions raised by the writ petitioner as well as the objections of the third respondent in the present writ petition. Hence, this Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the contentions raised in the present writ petition in the pending appeal. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

07.04.2026

NCC: Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No ssb To

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai-600 028.

2.The District Registrar, South Chennai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014.

M.DHANDAPANI, J. ssb

07.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.2313 and 2317 of 2024 The Tamil Nadu Government Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes Employees' Welfare Association (Reg.No.58/1976) represented by its State General Secretary, Mr.E.Elangovan, Having office at No.58, Kamarajapuram Extension, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai-600 028. 2.The District Registrar, South Chennai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. 3.Balagangatharathilagar ....Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the impugned Form-VII registered in favour of the third respondent vide proceedings dated 20.03.2023 by the second respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Raja For Respondents : Ms.Aswini Devi Additional Government Pleader for R1 and R2 Mr.J.Kannan for R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.