T.Gayathri v. The District Collector

O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for direction directing the fifth respondent to protect the peaceful possession and residence of the petitioner and her family members in respect of the property in Plot No.17, BDO layout, in Survey Nos.549/1 to an extent of 0.64.5 Hector, 528/1C2 to an extent of 0.07.5 Hector, 530/3A to an extent of

0.13.5 Hector, 549/2A to an extent of 0.18.0 Hector, 528/1C1 to an extent of 0.01.5 Hector, 528/1C3 to an extent of 0.01.0 Hector, 530/3B to an extent of 0.03.5 Hector and 549/3B to an extent of

0.39.5 Hector, Onnalvadi Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

2.It is seen that there is civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondents 6 to 11 including the partition suit. While being so, now the petitioner apprehends, R6 to R11 attempted to evict the petitioner from the property in Plot No.17, BDO layout, in Survey Nos.549/1 to an extent of 0.64.5 Hector, 528/1C2 to an extent of

0.07.5 Hector, 530/3A to an extent of 0.13.5 Hector, 549/2A to an extent of 0.18.0 Hector, 528/1C1 to an extent of 0.01.5 Hector, 528/1C3 to an extent of 0.01.0 Hector, 530/3B to an extent of 0.03.5 Hector and 549/3B to an extent of 0.39.5 Hector, Onnalvadi Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Therefore, the petitioner lodged complaint.

3.However, the learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) submits that the fifth respondent did not receive any complaint.

4.Therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the civil Court for appropriate relief. In order to save the property, police protection cannot be granted. Further, if any illegality is committed by the respondents 6 to 11, the petitioner is at liberty to lodge fresh complaint before the fifth respondent. If any such complaint is lodged by the petitioner, the fifth respondent shall take action against the accused in accordance with law, if any cognizable offence is made out.

5.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

20.07.2026 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To 1 The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 2 The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri Disitrict, Krishnagiri. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Hosur Division, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. 4 The Tahsildar Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 5 The Inspector of Police Hosur Police Station, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 6 The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai – 600 104. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J. pri And W.P.M.P. Crl. No.84 of 2026

20.07.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN And W.P.M.P. Crl. No.84 of 2026 T.Gayathri, Daughter of Late Thiyagaraja Reddy, Wife of Sudharshan Reddy Residing at No.2/9, O.Karrapalli, Onnalvadi, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District – 635 109. ... Petitioner Vs. 1 The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 2 The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri Disitrict, Krishnagiri. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Hosur Division, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. 4 The Tahsildar Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 5 The Inspector of Police Hosur Police Station, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 6 T.Sarala 7 Anandareddy 8 Nemilichand 9 Nemaram Choudhary 10 M.Rajendran 11 A.N.Murugesan ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 5th to protect the peaceful possession and residence of me and petitioner sisters in Plot No.17, BDO layout, in Survey Nos.549/1 to an extent of 0.64.5 Hector, 528/1C2 to an extent ofti.07.5 Hector, 530/3A to an extent of 0.13.5 Hector, 549/2A to an extent of 0.18.0 Hector, 528/1C1 to an extent of 0.01.5 Hector, 528/1C3 to an extent of 0.01.0 Hector, 530/3B to an extent of 0.03.5 Hector and 549/3B to an extent of 0.39.5 Hector, Onnalvadi Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District and prevent any interference or eviction attempt by the 6th to 11th respondents by considering petition representation dated 10.11.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Selvam For Respondents : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar for R1 to R5 Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) High Court of Madras Mr.V.Krishnamoorthy for R6 to R11